WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

FBI Agent Explains Why He Thinks Comey Moved the Clinton Investigation to FBI HQs

https://frankreport.com/2019/12/22/fbi-agent-explains-why-he-thinks-comey-moved-the-clinton-investigation-to-fbi-hqs/

The first part of this article, this FBI Agent explains his 30 years experience in the FBI. Very interesting.

This is to lend credibility to his statements about Comey & Co.....all blatant lies.

Comey deliberately moved the Clinton case to FBI headquarters in order to personally over see (micro-manage) a SHAM investigation!


......For instance, I consider the work that Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok did to be intel.

I also think that the audacity of former FBI director James Comey, in a “matter of fact” manner, telling President Trump in January 2017, that he knew the dossier was “salacious and unverified” as if it was okay and a well-known fact, and you know what?

It probably was when Comey signed the FISA warrant on Carter Page in October 2016!

If I knew that the FISA affidavits and applications were not just lacking in merit, but also based upon unverified, fraudulent information, then Comey, Yates, Rosenstein, Strzok, McCabe and all the other signors knew.

Signing those documents is a big deal that we, FBI agents, don’t take lightly. There is NO chance in hell that they didn’t know Hillary paid for the dossier!

I am telling you this so you can get a feel as to why I and other real agents resent what Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker and the others, some of whom are CIA, NSA and State Department officials, did to unseat a duly elected president and soil the name of the FBI!

James Comey is the only one in the FBI who could transfer the Clinton or any other criminal case to FBI HQ. Every single criminal case has an Office of Origin (OO). The OO is the boss of the case and in criminal investigations is ALWAYS an FBI Field Office like NYO or Miami and never FBI HQ. Why?

Because FBI HQ has NO investigative staff. It’s that simple! Comey wanted COMPLETE control over the Clinton case, so Comey, and nobody else made HQ the Office of Origin. That’s a “micro-manage” decision if ever there was one!

He also made FBI Agents with no criminal experience (McCabe and Strzok) assistant directors for a reason. They would not know the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, they would not know the Due Process or Best Evidence rules; they would not know the laws that govern or the rules and regulations and on and on.

For example, you cannot allow a defendant’s attorney to sit in on his client’s interview. Nothing good can come from that! McCabe and Strzok allowed five lawyers to sit with Hillary. Understand, this is my opinion, based upon what they did and my best guess, I never heard anything within the agency about their experience or accomplishments, which must be few to none.

No criminal agent I ever knew would violate the Constitution, our Rule of Law or their oath to “enforce the laws of the United States”, the way they did. Never!

Hillary’s name was not in the title of the “Hillary” investigation. That’s an intentional and blatant attempt by Comey to illegally try to obstruct her investigation, by trying to reduce her responsibility for her own criminal acts.

That’s obstruction by a government official. There are rules that apply to interviews of “subjects” that are substantially different from other types of interviews! Nobody but James Comey, himself could do that to the Hillary investigations.

Possible subjects cannot sit in on another subject’s interview, like Cheryl Mills did on Hillary’s interview. Mills is also a lawyer and a witness in Hillary’s cases!

Comey knew all of that. His claim that he relied on “experienced” agents to do the right thing is a blatant lie. Strzok and McCabe both testified that Comey directed them to leak info on pending cases to the press. Comey said he didn’t.

I will bet anybody that Comey is the liar on that one.

The FBI does not investigate “Matters”, we investigate Criminal Cases. So what Comey wants you to believe is that:

  1. He did not move one of the biggest cases in US/FBI history (Hillary, the former Secretary of State), to FBI Headquarters, so he could control everything. Something that had NEVER been done before! Somebody else did it and he doesn’t know who.

  2. Comey did not remove or intervene in the title of the Hillary case, by not naming Hillary the subject in the Hillary case. Someone else did and he doesn’t know who.

  3. He did not tell the “boys” (McCabe and Strzok) to allow 5 lawyers and witnesses and other subjects to sit in on the Hillary interview. Someone else did and he doesn’t know who.

  4. He didn’t pick two men with no criminal knowledge to run the biggest criminal case in recent history…he did that because he didn’t know that they were inexperienced men who knew nothing about criminal cases.

  5. He didn’t tell McCabe to violate the Best Evidence rules and withhold evidence found on the “Weiner’s” computer. McCabe never said anything about the incriminating evidence found against Uma Abedin and Hillary directly.

If McCabe and Strzok and Page and Baker don’t come clean and smarten up, they deserve what they get!

Wiretaps are the most intrusive form of a search warrant. These men cannot be allowed to violate US citizens’ civil rights against illegal search and seizure and the FISA trust. That’s why there are civil and criminal penalties. It’s serious!

**FBI Agent Explains Why He Thinks Comey Moved the Clinton Investigation to FBI HQs** https://frankreport.com/2019/12/22/fbi-agent-explains-why-he-thinks-comey-moved-the-clinton-investigation-to-fbi-hqs/ The first part of this article, this FBI Agent explains his 30 years experience in the FBI. Very interesting. This is to lend credibility to his statements about Comey & Co.....all blatant lies. Comey deliberately moved the Clinton case to FBI headquarters in order to personally over see (micro-manage) a SHAM investigation! ---- ......For instance, I consider the work that Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok did to be intel. I also think that the audacity of former FBI director James Comey, in a “matter of fact” manner, telling President Trump in January 2017, that he knew the dossier was “salacious and unverified” as if it was okay and a well-known fact, and you know what? It probably was when Comey signed the FISA warrant on Carter Page in October 2016! If I knew that the FISA affidavits and applications were not just lacking in merit, but also based upon unverified, fraudulent information, then Comey, Yates, Rosenstein, Strzok, McCabe and all the other signors knew. Signing those documents is a big deal that we, FBI agents, don’t take lightly. There is NO chance in hell that they didn’t know Hillary paid for the dossier! I am telling you this so you can get a feel as to why I and other real agents resent what Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker and the others, some of whom are CIA, NSA and State Department officials, did to unseat a duly elected president and soil the name of the FBI! James Comey is the only one in the FBI who could transfer the Clinton or any other criminal case to FBI HQ. Every single criminal case has an Office of Origin (OO). The OO is the boss of the case and in criminal investigations is ALWAYS an FBI Field Office like NYO or Miami and never FBI HQ. Why? Because FBI HQ has NO investigative staff. It’s that simple! Comey wanted COMPLETE control over the Clinton case, so Comey, and nobody else made HQ the Office of Origin. That’s a “micro-manage” decision if ever there was one! He also made FBI Agents with no criminal experience (McCabe and Strzok) assistant directors for a reason. They would not know the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, they would not know the Due Process or Best Evidence rules; they would not know the laws that govern or the rules and regulations and on and on. For example, you cannot allow a defendant’s attorney to sit in on his client’s interview. Nothing good can come from that! McCabe and Strzok allowed five lawyers to sit with Hillary. Understand, this is my opinion, based upon what they did and my best guess, I never heard anything within the agency about their experience or accomplishments, which must be few to none. No criminal agent I ever knew would violate the Constitution, our Rule of Law or their oath to “enforce the laws of the United States”, the way they did. Never! Hillary’s name was not in the title of the “Hillary” investigation. That’s an intentional and blatant attempt by Comey to illegally try to obstruct her investigation, by trying to reduce her responsibility for her own criminal acts. That’s obstruction by a government official. There are rules that apply to interviews of “subjects” that are substantially different from other types of interviews! Nobody but James Comey, himself could do that to the Hillary investigations. Possible subjects cannot sit in on another subject’s interview, like Cheryl Mills did on Hillary’s interview. Mills is also a lawyer and a witness in Hillary’s cases! Comey knew all of that. His claim that he relied on “experienced” agents to do the right thing is a blatant lie. Strzok and McCabe both testified that Comey directed them to leak info on pending cases to the press. Comey said he didn’t. I will bet anybody that Comey is the liar on that one. The FBI does not investigate “Matters”, we investigate Criminal Cases. So what Comey wants you to believe is that: 1. He did not move one of the biggest cases in US/FBI history (Hillary, the former Secretary of State), to FBI Headquarters, so he could control everything. Something that had NEVER been done before! Somebody else did it and he doesn’t know who. 2. Comey did not remove or intervene in the title of the Hillary case, by not naming Hillary the subject in the Hillary case. Someone else did and he doesn’t know who. 3. He did not tell the “boys” (McCabe and Strzok) to allow 5 lawyers and witnesses and other subjects to sit in on the Hillary interview. Someone else did and he doesn’t know who. 4. He didn’t pick two men with no criminal knowledge to run the biggest criminal case in recent history…he did that because he didn’t know that they were inexperienced men who knew nothing about criminal cases. 5. He didn’t tell McCabe to violate the Best Evidence rules and withhold evidence found on the “Weiner’s” computer. McCabe never said anything about the incriminating evidence found against Uma Abedin and Hillary directly. If McCabe and Strzok and Page and Baker don’t come clean and smarten up, they deserve what they get! Wiretaps are the most intrusive form of a search warrant. These men cannot be allowed to violate US citizens’ civil rights against illegal search and seizure and the FISA trust. That’s why there are civil and criminal penalties. It’s serious!

(post is archived)

Dont put those fucking exclamation points. I downvoted this for that