It is official - the Criminal Deep State are going for impeachment ~ Doubling Down on Their Treasonous Acts!
Yep, Jim Stone is correct. Deep State have totally backed themselves into a corner, it is now Do or Die for them. These are their last acts.......before they are arrested for Treason. Durham has been investigating them for the past year, and the case is confirmed to now be a CRIMINAL one. Deep State is just doubling down on their Treasonous acts. What do they have to lose? One can only be executed for Treason once, no matter how many counts of Treason!
Tick, Tick, Tick.........
From Jim Stone:
It is official - the Lefties are going for impeachment
They have now launched a soviet style"impeachment resolution" that is totally lacking transparency.
If they want to destroy the United States, their only chance is "secret tribunals" which, if successful, will prevent any need for them to scurry away like roaches to infest the 4 corners of the earth.
Hillary probably won't be generous with her ill gotten gains
Hillary: "Don't call Haiti a sh*thole, after all, after that earthquake I milked the place for $13 billion. It was, in fact, a gold mine.
Yep, an impeachment inquiry because of THIS:
Al Baghdadi's secure line to the State Department. Now that he's dead and the genie is out of the bottle, Pelosi simply has no choice or she's going down.
http://82.221.129.208/pages/yepitsbad1.jpg
Keep in mind that the above photo has been kept TOTALLY out of the media, so people don't realize why Pelosi made her move.
http://82.221.129.208/.vy9.html
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/fdc6613717ea48b0ad79780cfa81bf83/1000.jpeg
TRICK OR TREAT:
IMPEACHMENT HALLOWEEN ON HILL
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EIN8sQhXkAAYvz2?format=png&name=small
https://apnews.com/fd2765706ced4eb29c8737348c64d55c
Definition of coup d'état
: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group
CONgress is going to be gutted soon, on charges of Treason.
All of these shenanigans they have pulled are part and parcel of a COUP plot to remove a duly elected president. A Coup attempt is Treason!
Pelosi & Schumer went on that trip to Jordan & Afghanistan 2 weeks ago (violating the Logan Act at a minimum), but now it appears that they were consulting with the ISIS leader while in Jordan, which is aiding and abetting a known ENEMY of the State, which again is TREASON.
There have been so many Treasonous acts in the past 3 years, rest assured that Congress will be gutted soon.
THIS is what Trump Team are going after:
The following is a DECODING of a Q post:
https://qmap.pub/read/2523
Define Treason:
The crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
Define Subversion:
The act of subverting: a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within.
FAMOUS: Senator Lindsey Graham Questions Brett Kavanaugh Military Law vs Criminal Law (3 minutes).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_gmOsnjrZw
American Citizens CAN be deemed Enemy Combatants and be Tried by Military Tribunals.
Military Police Company Deploys to GITMO!!! Ready for inmates.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/28/when-it-comes-guantanamo-trump-truly-builder-chief.html📁
Trump has expanded military prison at GITMO, added a hospital, and court rooms, etc.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article210304199.html📁
Pentagon delivers new guidelines on transferring detainees to Guantánamo
"They are unlawful enemy combatants" Amen,legal definition of enemy combatants here:
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/enemy+combatant
Questioning: Graham > KAV re: 'enemy combatants' [unusual?]
This line of questioning has never been done before in a Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearing like this. Kavanaugh agreed that U.S. Citizens can be deemed Enemy Combatants and thus required to be tried by Military Tribunals. (It shocked the demoncraps. You could hear a pin drop as the astonished Demoncraps finally shut up during the hearing and listened intently to this line of questioning. It was wonderful!)
DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion re: detain re: US Citizen(s) re: 'Enemy Combatant'
Yes, I have posted the link and key passages further below. Trump is authorized to use the Military to round up and incarcerate these enemy combatants, and Trump is authorized to use deadly force and they must be kept far from the front lines of the battle, which means they must be kept away from the U.S., they must be detained GITMO, so they can do no further harm. (These psychopaths are toast!)
Drops combined paint a full picture.
We've got the Picture and we are loving it! GITMO is ready. Military Police are deployed to GITMO so they are ready. It is established that the criminal elite are deemed Enemy Combatants, and thus they will be detained at GITMO and tried under Military Law (Military Tribunals). Trump can use the U.S. Military and Deadly Force to round up these creeps, and detain them at GITMO. So the bigger question IS: Why is Q telling all of this NOW??? He is preparing we Patriots so we know the laws and we know exactly what is going on, so when lame stream media claims this is unconstitutional round up, we Patriots will be able to spread the TRUTH to counter MSM propaganda. So We The People have been Briefed and are ready FOR ACTION!!!
Do you believe in coincidences?
Used to, but not anymore! This is all planned to the endth degree, all i's dotted and all t's crossed! We Patriots have now received our briefing of what is about to transpire, so we are ready too! Everything ready for the round ups to begin!
This document was referenced by Q above:
DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion re: detain re: US Citizen(s) re: 'Enemy Combatant'....opinion drafted in 2002!
http://www.endusmilitarism.org/PDF/military_detention_of_US_citizens_and_18_USC_4001a.pdf
SOME KEY EXCERPTS:
As we explain below, the President’s authority to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, is based on his constitutional authority as Commander in Chief. We conclude that section 4001(a) does not, and constitutionally could not, interfere with that authority.
In order to understand the scope of section 4001(a), we first set out the proper context established by the President’s authority to detain enemy combatants during WAR. That authority arises out of the President’s constitutional status as Commander in Chief. Under the Commander in Chief Clause, the President is authorized to detain all enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens. Finally, we note that Congress has specifically authorized the President to use force against enemy combatants in response to the terrorist attack of September 11.
Article II of the Constitution….the Supreme Court has unanimously stated that it is** “the President alone [] who is constitutionally invested with the entire charge of hostile operations.”** Hamilton v Dillin, 88 U.S….1874…..
…..One of the core functions of the Commander in Chief is that of capturing and detaining members of the enemy….Numerous Presidents, for example, have orderd the capture and detention of enemy combatants during virtually every major conflict in the Nation’s history, including recent conflicts such as the Gulf, Vietnam, and Korean wars.
Recognizing this authority, Congress never has attempted to restrict or interfere with the President’s authority on this score. It is obvious that the current President plainly has authority to detain enemy combatants in connection with the present conflict, just as he has in every previous armed conflict.
….We should emphasize here that military detention of enemy combatants serves a particular goal, on that is wholly distinct from that of detention of civilians for ordinary law enforcement purposes. The purpose of law enforcement detention is punitive: to punish individuals, to collect evidence establishing that a crime may have been committed, to ensure that an individual will appear at a criminal trial,…..
The purpose of military detention, by contrast, is exclusively preventive……(“The object of capture is to prevent the captured individual from serving the enemy. He is disarmed and from then on he must be removed as completely as practicable from ‘the front’:……As Commander in Chief, the President **may order the detention of enemy combatants in order to prevent the individual from engating in further hostilities against the United States **(like trying to assassinate the President?), to deprive the enemy of that individual’s service, and to collect information helpful to the United States’ efforts to prosecute the armed conflict successfully…..
While enemy combatants also may be subject to criminal prosecution under United States or International law, …..evidence of criminal liability is legally unnecessary in order for the U.S. Armed Forces to detain an enemy combatant…..
….**The fact that a detainee is an American citizen, thus, does not affect the President’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief to detain him, once it has been determined that he is an enemy combatant. ** As the Supreme Court has unanimously held, all individuals, regardless of citizenship, who “associate” themselves with the military arm of the enemy” and “with its aid, guidance and direction enter this country bent on hostile acts are enemy belligerents….Nothing further need be demonstrated to justify their detention as enemy combatants. The individuals need not be caught while engaged in the act of war or captured with the theatre of war.
We accordingly conclude that, …. the President’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief to detain enemy combatants extends to U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike. (That means the Clintons & Co AND Soros and Soros minions, Israel, five eyes, etc.!
Finally, we note that the President’s constitutional authority to detain enemy combatants during the present conflict is bolstered by Senate Joint Resolution 23, which went into effect on Sept 18, 2001. That resolution recognizes that “the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United State.” Authorization for Use of Military Force……the resolution explicitly authorizes “the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept 11, 2001 or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.” Thus, Congress has specifically endorsed the use not only of deadly force, but also of the lesser-included authority to detain enemy combatants to prevent them from furthering hostilities against the United States.
(post is archived)