Two bad faith arguments. First you assert that I have somehow lost the debate. Then you try to infer that Im out of work in order to perpetrate an ad hominem. Again, this is your idea of “legitimate” argumentation? To me these are the tactics of a bad actor. I thought no downvotes were supposed to take care of problems like you? Maybe instead of engaging in shadey tactics you either 1.) respect my preference for downvotes 2.) try to make a logical good faith argument Good faith argument does not include >”because youre wrong” > “because I win” > “because Im better than you” Those are garbage arguments Is it free speech if a sub bans me? Is it free speech if a user blocks me? Isnt that an infringement of free speech? Isnt your defense of free speech totally arbitrary? Why wont you define a shill and state why you dont think he should have free speech? What is a shill? Answer the question. You actually don’t care about free speech or you wouldnt have such a problem with my opinion. All your arguments are typical of reddit leftists: “we don’t allow those opinions here. We’re all better off if you don’t voice them” You thought you would just throw your fat ass around and dictate to me how I should think about the lack of downvoting. You haven’t given me a single rationale for why Poal shouldnt allow downvotes. Just “because I said so” and “do your part!” . Is this the part where you tell me to wear a mask? Fail.