I am referring to the questions Ive asked from the beginning that you refuse to answer, because you cannot defend your position. It is completely arbitrary. You asserted that punshing users for using downvotes was
Defense of free speech
A defense against “ shills”
But you cant explain why.
I am referring to the questions Ive asked from the beginning that you refuse to answer, because you cannot defend your position. It is completely arbitrary. You asserted that punshing
users for using downvotes was
1. Defense of free speech
2. A defense against “ shills”
But you cant explain why.
I successfully defended my answer and revealed your questionable motives.
You're the psychopath in this conversation.
I successfully defended my answer and revealed your questionable motives.
You're the psychopath in this conversation.
No you didnt. I asked you why downvoting was depriving someone of free speech but upvoting wasn, t since they work THE SAME WAY. Your response was that I probably didnt have a JOB onad that I hadnt GONE TO COLLEGE!
Would you like me to show you the comments?
No you didnt. I asked you why downvoting was depriving someone of free speech but upvoting wasn, t since they work THE SAME WAY. Your response was that I probably didnt have a JOB onad that I hadnt GONE TO COLLEGE!
Would you like me to show you the comments?
(post is archived)