He didn't inject himself with, he just caught it. Same deal with ted nugent, who was a "covid denier". Ted nugent is 72, he recovered, but he also went through absolute hell, literally starting his day by crawling out of his bed at some point https://metalheadzone.com/ted-nugent-tests-positive-for-covid-19-and-says-i-literally-could-hardly-crawl-out-of-bed/
Now, you say they haven't "isolated the virus", but that's just an inaccurate talking point, they did isolate the virus https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
Specimen Collection Virus isolation from patient samples was deemed not to be human subjects research by the National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (research determination no. 0900f3eb81ab4b6e). Clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA, were collected as described (1). Nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens were collected on day 3 postsymptom onset, placed in 2–3 mL of viral transport medium, used for molecular diagnosis, and frozen. Confirmed PCR-positive specimens were aliquoted and refrozen until virus isolation was initiated. Cell Culture, Limiting Dilution, and Virus Isolation We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage.
https://poal.co/s/Science/391538/2d79533e-277d-4c91-aa91-de9e33e6be10#cmnts
You gotta prove that the original strain existed before you suggest others might come into being.
Ive had this conversation over and over with folks around here. Its been proven to exist as much as any virus has been proven to exist. If you understand the methods that are used to observe and identify viruses, please tell me which ones have been used on a virus like influenza that haven’t been used on sars cov 2? You probably don’t know how a virus is “proven” to exist.
If anything, what I'm saying is this:
Just because over reaction is the wrong answer, doesn't render total denial as the valid one
That's all I'm saying, it's not a true or false boolean type of situation. If History has taught us anything about the "fuckeries" pulled on us on a daily basis, is that those engineering them, are fans of catch22 scenarios https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)
A catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations.[1]The term was coined by Joseph Heller, who used it in his 1961 novel Catch-22. An example is:
"How can I get any experience until I get a job that gives me experience?" – Brantley Foster in The Secret of My Success.
Example: you can vote democrats or republicans, you can vote for "full degenerates" or "do nothing toads on the side of the road". In both instances they are fully onboard with the forever war party.
Thanks for the info, I thought they just used the “soup method” and picked pieces out of the slurry and reconstructed it.
Idk what method they used, I'm not a virologist... Are you? Chances are, no.
So let's not pretend you and I can dump an expertise on anything here
However, what's for sure, is that there are standard protocols to isolate a virus.
And I find it odd, that nobody (capable of an expertise, such as an actual virologist) came forward and said "this is ALL bullshit that's not how you isolate a virus! I'll show you how superior smart I am!"
Like there are none. All over the planet, all virologists are just getting along with a blatant hoax, and my ass is chicken while we're at it.
I think it was Yeader who mentioned the method they were using and said it’s subpar and can be a concoction of multiple viruses that are just pieces of rna and then they reverse engineer it to the best of their ability.
(post is archived)