WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

608

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking?

The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers.

This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall.

That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems.

Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C.

  • Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand).

e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking? The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers. This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall. That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems. Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C. * Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand). e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.
[–] 1 pt

Also, it was done by ONE GUY. I'm convinced he taught himself how to think in Assembly rather than write it out and translate it then copy that translation into Assembly. Regardless of how he actual wrote it, the game runs smoothly. It would even run smoothly on old systems (considered old at that time) when it first came out.

[–] 1 pt

I think assembly being ultra hard and only usable by savants is a well spread exaguration. It persists because so few people learn assembly, probably because they a priori assume that they wont be able to. Assembly is hard but it not as hard as its rumored to be. At least thats my impression.

I'm not saying that I'm not impressed by Rollercoaster Tycoon though.