WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

697

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking?

The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers.

This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall.

That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems.

Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C.

  • Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand).

e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking? The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers. This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall. That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems. Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C. * Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand). e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.
[–] 2 pts

What if, as Ken Thompson spoke about in 1984 when receiving his Turing Award, all compilers are compromised and are used to backdoor any programs they compile? If this were true, wouldn't the conspiracy be safe to pursue its agenda if not one modern programmer had the smarts to find the compromised code and simply adopted the tools without question?

Perhaps that is what happened here. It's plausible if you think about the stakes involved. If you have only script-kiddie-level programmers who don't know C, C++ or Assembly, who will stand a chance at finding the backdoors? The black ops that made this happen could be assured that they could get into any code they wanted to and manipulate it with whatever payload they added at compile time. This would backdoor everything and we'd never know it. I say it's already been done and we are living in it now. Hell it's probably baked into microcode and baseband firmware too. Trust nothing because you can't find that which does not exist at the level at which we can see things.

Is C/C++/Assembly not being taught to keep us from probing too deeply? Food for thought. Go read Ken Thompson's warning about this. It's eye-popping.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

https://cs155.stanford.edu/papers/thompson.pdf For anyone curious about what Ken Thompson said.

If you have only script-kiddie-level programmers who don't know C, C++ or Assembly, who will stand a chance at finding the backdoors?

That's spoton, though. In my opinion, anyway. Assembly is literal substitution of binary, that's it. There's no place to hide. If you know it, but that's why my point and post exist, so yes.

e: I have no idea if that's the correct paper, but whatever, have a read.