WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

583

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking?

The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers.

This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall.

That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems.

Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C.

  • Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand).

e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.

The World runs on C and in some part, though smaller, on C++. Rust can't keep up, despite the lies that it can. Python is a script, not a language and is hopelessly out matched when C does the same thing Python is doing. C#, Java, are you joking? The idea is, the false push of all of the above but primarily the two first mentioned, is to prevent White children->adults from learning C. That's it. That's why colleges now not only don't teach C, but they hate on C like it's a boogeyman.C's problem isn't memory safety. C's problem is short-sighted programmers. This become glaring when you look at things specifically from the C++ side. C++ is used in many game engines. Notably among them is the Unreal Engine. The problem is: the Unreal Engine is less optimized than a troon's gash. Then go back and read about John Carmack and the insane mathematical and programming leaps he made in efficiency for various games of the 90s. (seriously go read about it, it's an interesting read) and a number of others I can't recall. That's type of thinking isn't taught anymore, and it's not done anymore for multiple reasons. One is that people are lazy and greedy (one, kek) and two because they're never actually taught in a rigorous way on ho to fundamentally design algorithms to solve problems. Now, none of this is to say I'm against either; I'm not. But I am against them being taught in place of C. * Last thing, I think it was posted here but I forget... There are schools around the World that are extremely private and costly. They don't have digital submersion or whatever. They don't integrate digital <thing> into note taking, for the classroom board, attendance, course anything. Because (((they))) know, technology makes you a fucking retard (source: me). How do these fit together with the first 80% of this thread? Think it over (had you gone to one of those private schools you would understand). e: should have mentioned (((javascript))), woops.
[–] 1 pt

OP is correct.

Perl is my go to for most stuff. I learned C and C++ in school so Perl was easy. Not to mention you need a C compiler to compile Perl. If I need to interact with the hardware, it has to be C or C++ (or Assembler) and that is what I think they want to stop for some odd reason.

[–] 0 pt

That's fair. I don't care what language you use, but after you get some fundamentals with whatever, so logic, if else, while, for, scope, etc. Then learn a bit of C to get 'under the hood' and the go to whatever your language of choice is. That big of C learning will always transfer over.

[–] 1 pt

That is how it should be. If an employer goes one way...cool. Most of the time most IT shops start out with something because the first crew had those skills on hand. Be it C/C++, .NET, etc.

[–] 0 pt

It's the same as the reason behind the lie of "WE TOTALLY NEED IPV5!!!", nah, we don't. internet: network of networks

IPv6: everythign has a accessible address. Where the (((IETF))) u sed the EUI-64 where your MAC address was used to form your GUA. Which then means: show up in target and touch wifi - you are now known, and more. IPv6 is fully jewish. IPv4 is more than enough to cover the World more than IPv6. One layer of NAT gives a theoretical 4.3billion ^ (4.3 billion)

[–] 1 pt

Exactly. I still haven't been at any job that has implemented IPv6. Some partial for some [some reason] but not 100% across the environment.