WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

110

(post is archived)

I disagree.

That argument can be made about any technology. When was the last "breakthrough" in transportation? The invention of the airplane? How about civil engineering? Did we get a major change on how we build roads, bridges or buildings in the last 100 years? I wouldn't know for sure but I'm guessing not.

All technologies will get their greatest leaps in their infancy, when everything is unknown. After that, it's all incremental. And whilst no individual advancement will look that impactful, all added together make a big difference over time. Try to develop anything using only 60s IT technology and see how that goes.

[–] 1 pt

Since 1996 we’ve gotten: ... Docker, Kubernetes...

Does not mention mobile at all, and then:

Since 1996 almost everything has been cleverly repackaging and re-engineering prior inventions. Or adding leaky layers to partially paper over problems below.

Clearly the author has no idea what Docker and Kubernetes are.

[–] 1 pt

No, the author doesn't have much idea what anything is.

[–] 0 pt

Yep and dismisses machine learning which is a radically different way to program than C++

[–] 1 pt

Third world types, along with muh womyn coderz ruined software.

[–] 0 pt

Open source destroyed everything great.

[–] 0 pt

LOL Why do you say that?

[–] 0 pt
  • Retards giving their work for away for free
  • Lower quality overall
  • Requirement to keep repos going in existing stagnant languages
  • Its the antithesis of playing games on Windows, which is the only point of computers.
[–] 0 pt

Thanks for the reply. I could read each of your points sarcastically. However, I'm not sure if you are being sarcatic?