I posted about them "demoing" this system easily like 2 years ago. Guess they decided to make it a "primary feature".
No man, if I want to allow cops access to my camera's they have to come to me. This is why I don't use cloud shit.
Oh, and they are not doing it for free either. Our taxes will be paying for access to those feeds. All over the country..
This is going to be abused so much and so fast it would snap your neck with the whiplash.
Archive: https://archive.today/A09Vg
From the post:
>Ring founder Jamie Siminoff is back at the helm of the surveillance doorbell company, and with him is the surveillance-first-privacy-last approach that made Ring one of the most maligned tech devices. Not only is the company reintroducing new versions of old features which would allow police to request footage directly from Ring users, it is also introducing a new feature that would allow police to request live-stream access to people’s home security devices.
I posted about them "demoing" this system easily like 2 years ago. Guess they decided to make it a "primary feature".
No man, if I want to allow cops access to my camera's they have to come to me. This is why I don't use cloud shit.
Oh, and they are not doing it for free either. Our taxes will be paying for access to those feeds. All over the country..
This is going to be abused so much and so fast it would snap your neck with the whiplash.
Archive: https://archive.today/A09Vg
From the post:
>>Ring founder Jamie Siminoff is back at the helm of the surveillance doorbell company, and with him is the surveillance-first-privacy-last approach that made Ring one of the most maligned tech devices. Not only is the company reintroducing new versions of old features which would allow police to request footage directly from Ring users, it is also introducing a new feature that would allow police to request live-stream access to people’s home security devices.
(post is archived)