Wow. Wow.
Police state, here we are.
You just now getting that memo? We've been here.
No. I realize it's been like this for a while. Simply acknowledging the on going march towards ever more tyranny.
Wow. Wow.
Police state, here we are.
You just now getting that memo? We've been here.
No. I realize it's been like this for a while. Simply acknowledging the on going march towards ever more tyranny.
Don't use any biometrics or facial recognition to gain access to any devices. Passwords or patterns only.
Or if you do, reboot it as soon as the cops start talking. I think all of them require the pin/password on reboot.
You may use biometrics for in app authentication without using biometric for unlock. That strikes a better, but maybe imperfect, balance
>9th Circuit
According to the website Ballotpedia, "Since 2007, the Ninth Circuit had a reversal rate of 80.3 percent."
I predict another reversal in their future.
Yeah, that is very possible. Also, if your court has that bad of a "win rate" you are doing something wrong and unconstitutional.
Forcing you to communicate a private device password? That is unacceptable behavior for government.
Forcing movement of your body and property to achieve the result of forced confession, acceptable.
You may be enslaved by government to furnish evidence against yourself. You may not be required to speak evidence against yourself, however. Expect further rulings to clarify that forced servitude must be of "reasonable duration" using means which are not morally repugnant and reasonably calculated to bring about the desired product of such servitude.
(post is archived)