WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts (edited )

Socialism worked amazingly in Sweden.

And then they started importing (sand)niggers by the millions, and then it stopped working for some reason.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

People don't understand that it's the demographics that matter.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Economics impacts demographics. We had low interest rates in 2006, creating a housing boom. Someone had to move into them, and the Hispanics were propped up by sub-prime mortgages. Look at when it first took off, 2005-2006.

Now Muslims are attracted to UK free healthcare, Sweden's socialism and progressive tax code, and attracted to our medical welfare (medicare, obamacare, not paying in ERs). Things they couldn't get away with in their home countries.

For Milena countries had no immigration policies, yet they remained ethnically distinct. This shit is bread by economics and most people are too ignorant of economics for it to even cross their mind.

With zero safety net why would anyone move to a country they can't communicate in without knowing what they would do for a job?

A free market only attracts the best and you end up not only with the advantages of a free market but also better genetic stock.

Wrong. Your economic system doesn't require that you flood your country with 3rd world migrants.

[–] 0 pt

Economics impacts demographics. We had low interest rates in 2006, creating a housing boom. Someone had to move into them, and the Hispanics were propped up by sub-prime mortgages. Look at when it first took off, 2005-2006. Now Muslims are attracted to UK free healthcare, Sweden's socialism and progressive tax code, and attracted to our medical welfare (medicare, obamacare, not paying in ERs). Things they couldn't get away with in their home countries.

Simply having strong border controls would solve these issues a lot easier than trying to shape your entire economy around not attracting migrants and just hoping they don't show up.

For Milena countries had no immigration policies, yet they remained ethnically distinct. This shit is bread by economics and most people are too ignorant of economics for it to even cross their mind.

Maybe, but this is irrelevant, there were other factors limiting mass migration (except in rare situations like the Turkic invasions of Anatolia), for example it was a lot harder and slower to move a large amount of people great distances without access modern transportation which would cut down the numbers significantly.

[–] 0 pt

stop talking about melania that way bitch

[–] 0 pt (edited )

They are related. When you have a mixed economy lowlifes are attracted to moving there. They didn't import them the people moved themselves. They may have allowed them to move there which was a mistake, but even if you don't allow them they come illegally (see America). How much welfare your economy has is much more related to the number of untermench your nation attracts than any immigration policy.

Welfare breeds untermench and untermench go where they can be bread.