This is exactly what I hate about these kinds of articles. He didn't get "clobbered" or "btfo" or anything of the sort. He got denied. They tried something, and the judge said "no".
Now, if this was used as evidence of treason, and the judge ruled him guilty, well that would be "clobbered".
This is exactly what I hate about these kinds of articles. He didn't get "clobbered" or "btfo" or anything of the sort. He got denied. They tried something, and the judge said "no".
Now, if this was used as evidence of treason, and the judge ruled him guilty, well that would be "clobbered".
the "law" is collusively corrupt..... invalidating it!!!
the "law" is collusively corrupt..... invalidating it!!!
(post is archived)