But yeah, I think this reporting is suspicious. Someone telling a story about something a dead man said that seems to contradict the way he acted when he lived is suspicious. Kirk was out there aggressively supporting funding for Israel, claiming they were the most moral army, claiming Israel's suppression of aid organizations was a hoax even while this has just been a known fact that MSM hasn't even been trying to cover up. He was completely funded by Zionists. These new "revelations" seem like a work — an attempt to sanitize Kirk's Zionism by insinuating he had a change of heart at the last minute.
But the article isn't denying that he was heavily funded by Zionists at all? It says right there
Kirk was 18 years old when he launched TPUSA in 2012. From its inception, his career was propelled by Zionist donors, who showered his young organization with money through neoconservative outfits like the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
And it links to the recent public appearances he made where he appeared to be complaining about getting harassed by Zionists recently for not toeing the line hard enough, mostly for platforming people who were notably more critical of Israel, like Tucker Carlson and David Smith. Here he is saying that in
Overall, I am not even really certain what point you are trying to make here.
I guess I am just not seeing the same contradictions you are seeing in the article3
The admissions in the article about Kirk’s Zionism and funding acknowledge complaints and concerns critical thinkers might have had about his record.
The anonymous source claims — that he rejected a funding offer, that he had, behind closed doors, warned Trump not to bomb Iran, that he despised Netanyahu as a “bully”, and that he was afraid of Israel — put a spin on the facts above that paints Kirk in a good light to those who would have disliked him or been indifferent to his death.
The point I’m making is: I don’t believe the source. This is all narrative weaving based on nothing.
Finally a voice of reason. I don't believe that pissrael specifically targeted Charlie. Did/Does pissrael hate/hated Charlie? Probably. At this point the tranny violence still seems most likely given all of the known info.
I would be more than happy to recant with any decent evidence.
But to me the simplest answer seems to be the current truth.
I mean who knows. But this has obviously become some kind of "current thing" hysteria. It seems appropriate to be on guard.
Trannies are really miserable people and just looking for people to blame for their misery.
(post is archived)