It's not a non-sequitur. That's just not the definition of the term. If I had replied, "the cows fly home at midnight", THAT would be a non-sequitur. If you're going to use Latin phrases, at least learn to use them properly. What I said follows very logically. The problem that the WEF thinks exists is "overpopulation". They didn't say "overpopulation by a bunch of spics, niggers and chinks". Overpopulation, per se, is not a problem. In fact, greater numbers of people will improve our living standards. People are what produce things, and we need to produce in order to consume. If we have more producers, then we have more things we can produce. And if our tech improves and makes us more productive, than we all become more prosperous as a result. This is basic economics. It's not just dim-witted Denosivan-derived minority populations that are the problem. They can still perform simple and low-skill labor to support more intelligent individuals. We all still need lots of low-skill workers making products that we consume every day. Those low-skill workers could be whites or minorities; it really doesn't matter. The point is that population growth improves living standards. Would I prefer fewer niggers and other such folk? Sure. But that is not the issue that this post is about. If you think it is, then go join the WEF and see how serious they are about exterminating the third world and increasing the growth of the white race. I'll wait while you figure that one out.