WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

>I don't know why you believe the world would be better off with a lower population.

Tell me you want more diversity niggers in your midst without telling me you want more diversity niggers in your midst...

Seriously, you want more of that? -> https://youtu.be/0H5nIQPzBzQ?t=32 Because there's no shortage of those retarded savages, actually their numbers are exploding

You want more? Why? What for?

Maybe those guys are god's shittest; you accept them, tolerate them, you get more of them. And when you get too much of them, it's game over, they takeover. At that point you failed the test, and you're completely fucked

[–] 0 pt

They said on another thread that you were a retard and that seems to be the case.

What if I wanted 16 billion whites on the planet? Would you oppose that?

Because that is absolutely what I meant.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

They? Oh you mean the "forever buttmad at 0K" club?

Ah!

Well they're mad at me for a reason... And what's funny is that they don't come to me to settle score, they don't dare :)

What if I wanted 16 billion whites on the planet? Would you oppose that?

Non sequitur, irrelvant. We're not talking about what you want for christmas, and santa claus isn't real

We're getting overrun by violently retarded diversity niggers, and whites are less than 10% of the world population (and I'm generous...), that's the reality on the ground, TODAY. And there won't be a cake for everybody.... You want to feed 8 billion people? 90% of which aren't white? Well I'm afraid that's going to be at our expense...

Your call

[–] 0 pt

It's not a non-sequitur. That's just not the definition of the term. If I had replied, "the cows fly home at midnight", THAT would be a non-sequitur. If you're going to use Latin phrases, at least learn to use them properly. What I said follows very logically.

The problem that the WEF thinks exists is "overpopulation". They didn't say "overpopulation by a bunch of spics, niggers and chinks".

Overpopulation, per se, is not a problem. In fact, greater numbers of people will improve our living standards. People are what produce things, and we need to produce in order to consume. If we have more producers, then we have more things we can produce.

And if our tech improves and makes us more productive, than we all become more prosperous as a result. This is basic economics.

It's not just dim-witted Denosivan-derived minority populations that are the problem. They can still perform simple and low-skill labor to support more intelligent individuals. We all still need lots of low-skill workers making products that we consume every day.

Those low-skill workers could be whites or minorities; it really doesn't matter. The point is that population growth improves living standards.

Would I prefer fewer niggers and other such folk? Sure.

But that is not the issue that this post is about.

If you think it is, then go join the WEF and see how serious they are about exterminating the third world and increasing the growth of the white race.

I'll wait while you figure that one out.