WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Agreed. There's already too many people for us all to 'have nice things', and we're well past the point of diminishing returns wherein the harm of larger populations starts to outweigh the few benefits.

They don't seem to be actually going for depopulation, however; instead all of their efforts are geared towards engineering larger/denser populations which have been trained to accept lower standards of living.

[–] 0 pt

Humans only inhabit 5% of the earths land mass. problem is, the population is too concentrated around the wealth. Alaska is the most unpopulated place in America. If the motherfucking save the planet peeps want to make everything solar. start putting that shit in alaska which has 40 more minutes average daylight. But we all know it's about control and not about climate.

[–] 0 pt

Sure, but consider that the concentration of most people into those areas is likely sparing the world's ecology from much greater harm. It would be nice if more of us could hunt without waiting for tags, and live on homesteads with a few acres to farm... But the more of us there are, the smaller the proportion of us who can theoretically live like that without doing severe damage to ecology at large. The current pop. is already very leveraged with the shitty practices of industrialized agriculture, cheap grains and they want us eating ze bugs next. More people will only contribute to the already dropping standard of living in the West (and everywhere else too once the low-hanging fruit of basic development is played out).

Also when you count all agriculture, power generation or other modification to the land, we are using more like 50% of land mass (and of course that's ecologically linked to the other half). I agree that the globalists are spinning this issue for more control, but there is some real cause for concern if you don't think humans should aspire to live like bugmen.

[–] 0 pt

Earth is a closed loop, There is no more carbon and no less carbon than there has always been, no more water and no less water. all mankind has done is convert it from one state to another. the earth does a fine job of taking care of itself. too may people populate an area, a storm and/or a flood will discourage habitation of that area. the earth ended up and stays in the Goldilocks zone that no other known planet has done. the earth is not a dead planet. it is actively living and in control. have a little faith in your host.