You make assumptions so you can belittle people.
THE FUCKING COURT TOLD YOU WHAT THE QUESTION OF LAW WAS IN THIS CASE. IT'S THE FIRST FUCKING PARAGRAPH OF THE COURT'S RULING.
Do you even know what "assumption" means?
Show us in the opinion where it says the question of law is whether Washington D.C. has jurisdiction in any state. Not where you think it's implied, but where it literally says "this is the question before this court." If you cannot, it is you who are making the assumptions.
> You make assumptions so you can belittle people.
THE FUCKING COURT TOLD YOU WHAT THE QUESTION OF LAW WAS IN THIS CASE. IT'S THE FIRST FUCKING PARAGRAPH OF THE COURT'S RULING.
Do you even know what "assumption" means?
Show us in the opinion where it says the question of law is whether Washington D.C. has jurisdiction in any state. Not where you think it's implied, but where it literally says "this is the question before this court." If you cannot, it is you who are making the assumptions.
You sure conduct yourself as a liberal; trying to tell other what to think. If I'm an idiot, okay, just be mature and move along. but hell no; you gotta act like a fucking liberal. I'm done. move on faggot liberal.
You sure conduct yourself as a liberal; trying to tell other what to think. If I'm an idiot, okay, just be mature and move along. but hell no; you gotta act like a fucking liberal. I'm done. move on faggot liberal.
(post is archived)