Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

439

Now we get to see a Supreme Court justice get 'put on trial' by a complete kangaroo court which will 'convict' him in complete violation of the Free Association clause of the First Amendment. They will look to unseat a sitting Supreme Court Justice due to 'Guilt by Association by Association' ... they are not even saying he talked to the wrong people. They are saying he talked to someone who talked to the wrong people. Unbelievable.

Now we get to see a Supreme Court justice get 'put on trial' by a complete kangaroo court which will 'convict' him in complete violation of the Free Association clause of the First Amendment. They will look to unseat a sitting Supreme Court Justice due to 'Guilt by Association by *Association*' ... they are not even saying he talked to the wrong people. They are saying he talked to someone who talked to the wrong people. Unbelievable.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I was not aware that the Democrats hold a man legally or professionally liable for any crimes his wife may have been accused of. That seems regressive as hell, do the Democrats consider wives to be subordinate to their husbands? Those sexist pigs!