Not something that I would advocate for, personally. But then again a lot of people can't handle the truth of where things are now and you can't give your enemy a huge propoganda win by saying your pattern of firing people is reckless and costing lives. The fact that people still care about a virus that has been tested for 6 billion times with one in one thousand tested allegedly dying of that virus within 30 days or more, being on average above the median life expectancy of every country on earth, shows how easily people can be manipulated.
I definitely advocate for firing people for things like gross incompetence, corruption, treason, and attempting to undermine and strip away the inalienable God-given rights guaranteed to us by the constitutions of many of our Western nations.
I am also highly suspicious of anyone who doesn't advocate for the firing of such individuals for the sake of "optics". That's so preposterous that I don't think there's any way to interpret your position other than to assume you are acting on behalf of these people.
How many people armed themselves and burned down cities for an entire summer, in mobs, during this pandemic, with the support of local law enforcement, prosecutors, mayor's, governors, senators, representatives, etc?
Any appropriately sized response would look like Night of the Long knives and still now, after years of managing the information of a counter narrative people will be hesitant to embrace devolution if it ends up happening.
We're talking about firing bad-faith bureaucrats, not burning cities down. You are a glownigger.
(post is archived)