Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

396

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts (edited )

(((Feldman))) wrote an article about (((Nadler))) attempting to influence Justice that has already been carried out twice. How perfectly Jewish of him.

Enough is enough already.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

And, how perfectly plebeian of you, to publicly display your ignorant prejudice against Jews..

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

There was no prejudice shown. Do you feel the facts that were pointed out are something to be ashamed of? Maybe you’re just projecting.

Edit to add:

You should really try to make sure you get your punctuation correct when attempting to insult somebody. Otherwise, you’ll look like an idiot, and it’s tough to take anything an idiot says seriously.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, it is a shame I guess, that no one takes you seriously.

[–] • 4 pts

That won’t go down well. At all…. Use the DOJ to overturn a jury trial result because it handed you a political loss? Way to push even more conservatards over to the far right… where all of the answers make sense and everyone knows that your kind are to blame…. That’s daft.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

They were going to arrest chauvin on the court house steps if he wasn’t convicted.

They’re crying about white supremacy so today jews are white? Where’s the dear fellow white peoples posts day.

[–] • 0 pt

Oy Vey , the chutzpah of this one.

He reminds me of the Penguin from Batman

[–] • 0 pt

"Review". What fcking for, you fat fuck? Nadler never saw a chocolate cake he didn't like. Mix in a salad every now and again you POS.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It doesn't set enough precident. The correct precedent to set is that if some group of people are burning down your town, the town's people can shoot them on sight to prevent continued violent destruction. In what kind of clown world is this not reasonable. Yet we have to have a trial over something far from actual reason.

If he had shot an arsonist who was protected by a violent mob, whom the police were refusing to address, then that would be the gray area.. in a lesser clown world. If that went to trial we could debate if we were in clown world or not for it, but with the case that actually went forward there is no doubt.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, that they would want to appeal the verdict if it didn't turn out in their favor, is to be expected, but the fat jewish cunt should be investigated/indicted for calling it a miscarriage of justice.

No question this is a blatant attempt to politically influence the outcome of the likely coming appeal, which by incident is illegal.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I heard the "fat cunt" was Presbyterian or maybe Catholic.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm sure that he's at least a "honorary" jew, then..