WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

662

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

They are throwing this case to cause civil unrest.

If the good guys aren't twelve steps ahead of this one, i'd be hornswaggled.

[–] 6 pts

Good. I want a civil war. They will lose. They are narcissists who overestimate themselves.

[–] 0 pt

No civil war. Those are brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers.

We want to rid the world of the serpents that cause your mentality.

[–] 5 pts

They are lost. They are zombies and wraiths. They are now evil, and evil must be eradicated.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

We have nothing in common.

Don't like them, don't like you either.

HIS mentality? They want to kill your children. That doesn’t inform your position on this? I don’t want war either, but not for the silly reasons you state.

[–] 5 pts

The Chauvin case was a total mistrial and he still got the book thrown at him by the Jury of the Apes. The case is terrible for the prosecution because reality is terrible for the prosecution and the case should have never been brought to trail. Even so it doesn't mean shit when the democrat autocracy is already stalking jurors and making known the party line.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

The media will lie any way it can to get him jailed and start riots over any verdict.

[–] 2 pts

On the first part I agree. The jew is talking, the jew is lying. However whites are not going to riot over a conviction, I've lost faith in our ability to do anything collectively but decline in total passivity. If riots are the goal then they need an acquittal or a very light sentencing. However I don't think riots are the goal, seeing as the country is under dem control and it's not even close to election season.

[–] 0 pt

Yep. Jurors know riots are coming no matter what the verdict. They even rioted a little after the Chauvin railroad.

[–] 3 pts

Civil unrest?

Will it be BLM niggers or communist antifa or idiotic rainbow Christians sucking immigrant dicks?

[–] 0 pt

Lol, couldn’t imagine the real 8 billion eaters attacking Christians. Especially when you are talking about immigration vs a self defense case, totally unrelated.

[–] 1 pt

Self defense case? How's that liberal BLM, Feminist, Immigrant-Loving, Transsexual-gender-accepting, Chosen-people-worshiping thing working out for you?

I'm directing this question to Molly Tibbits and her father and mother and all her friends that think indians from central America are the same as White people that live in Iowa. .......Oh, Molly Tibbits can't answer because she was raped to death with corns jammed up her rectum by one of those Christians. (You knew they were a Christian because they wore a little cross around their neck) l o l

It's so sad.

It's so, so sad.

.............. ..............

Do you think this is real? https://www.census.gov/popclock/world

[–] 1 pt

What if it leads to another self defense shoot against commies? It could start a positive feedback loop lol.

Keep defending.

When someone tries to put you in a box, they are also attacking you.

[–] 1 pt

There are no good guys. Declaring there are tells the rest of us everything we need to know about you.

[–] 0 pt

I think a aquittal negates all the wrongful death lawsuits against the city. It definitely seems that they are tanking this case.

[–] 1 pt

Directed verdict. The Judge can step in now and literally free kyle from all charges.

[–] 6 pts

I had a customer I had to take care of so I missed this witness. However, the ginger autidt blew up prosecution and I got to see that live. Another bad day for prosecution. Fat man doing lots of face palming. How those guys manage to face another day of this ass whipping is heroic.

[–] 2 pts

I'd just like to point out that GWAR once had a censorship-driven villan named Granbo, combo of grandmother and Rambo. That is all.

[–] 1 pt

The greatest thing about this trial is the memes.

[–] 0 pt

Have you seen how msm reports on this trial?

Took one for the team and checked aaand it's not pretty.. i'll supply no links, as a search on the defendants name and the outlets must be enough to verify the nuggets of selective truths.

Examples of loaded narrative:

The Guardian:

>When a prosecutor asked Grosskreutz why he did not shoot Rittenhouse, Grosskreutz said: “Like I said, that’s not the kind of person that I am. That’s not why I was out there. It’s not who I am. And definitely not somebody I would want to become.”

No mention of the justified self defence in the article. Heavily loaded againt Rittenhouse.

BBC headline:

>Man shot by Kyle Rittenhouse says he pointed own gun amid fears for life

Article is overall elegantly loaded against the defendant.

CNN headline:

>Armed paramedic who was shot by Kyle Rittenhouse testifies he thought teen was an active shooter

Unsurprisingly heavily loaded jewry..

[–] 2 pts

Newsweek literally publish a headline that completely lied and said that Gaugedears Grosskike testified the Rittenhouse reloaded before shooting.

Even the kike didn't lie that much. The author is a commie bug chink.

[–] 1 pt

"commie bug chink." You think?