If this is real then it is slick and is exactly what I've been saying people need to do. Don't give your enemy time to prepare. Do the work, call a sudden press conference, release the data AFTER it's investigated and go all in.
Well when you have real information you drop it. When you don’t, you brag about shit you don’t have and talk it up for months at a time hoping you come up with something.
Or you drop fake secret messages on the Internet about how no one can stop what is coming and you leave stupid gay clues and play word games and trick people with a LARP because you don’t have anything.
I believe Biden cheated, or that his handlers did, but Republicans have done a horrible job of exposing it. Just terrible. Every single one of their dumb stupid presentations is a complete mess. They show up unprepared with no skills whatsoever at making presentations or public speaking. They make some fairly convincing claims but have very little to no physical evidence that they can actually just handover to someone to prove it to them.
I’m not getting my hopes up, but there is some sense that this might be different. He came right out with it. Further, he gave damning proof, not just claims, but actual proof. He had physical evidence, not just mathematical models that no one cares about even if they should. Physical evidence, hard proof, this is the way it should’ve been done from the beginning.
The other possible game changer, and no, I don’t actually think anything will ever happen, but at least it’s interesting, is if Jovan Pulitzer is telling the truth and he’s about to show hard and direct evidence of fake ballots, printed ballots, etc.
That to me would constitute physical evidence, something undeniable, something that doesn’t need to be modeled or graphed it could simply be produced in person.
At some point someone somewhere needs to show the actual fraudulent ballots and that they specifically went for Biden. Then you do the math and then you have something.
But who is going to enforce the law? Which corrupt bureau or agency is going to enforce the law? What corrupt court is going to direct someone to enforce the law?
I personally think all of the press conferences called up to this one are laughable. This one got my attention. Swift and concise and AFTER the investigation. I'm convinced everything else is smoke and mirrors, including AZ which is not a popular stance on here so I keep it to myself but I personally think ALL of AZ is bullshit distraction.
Agreed. Everyone knows elections are full of cheating, going back to the 30's when they gave people alcohol and drove them around all night to vote. It's nothing new but this one was particularly blatant. Since people have voted there has been cheating but this one was especially weird because it was pretty obvious that the media calls elections. It was obvious before but not to this degree.
Sussman is interesting to me because years ago I came across a man who claimed to have worked at Perkins Coie and left because he was stunned over the blatant outright cheating and lying going on at the law firm. This was 2016. Long before any of these names came out. He named them all. More than that, exactly what he said and what has come out are identical. So, I cannot say he was telling the truth back in 2016 but I can say, now, that he was 100 percent right.
Who is going to enforce it? Excellent question. Prolly not the Former Bureau of Investigation. I imagine there has to be an element here at play that we don't know about. Look I've had my eyes on this for awhile and I have never seen a list of resignations like this https://www.resignation.info/
I keep an eye on the US portion especially. https://www.resignation.info/country/united-states-of-america
If Police Chiefs or Sheriffs resign then something is at play. Until then, I can't speculate. I can only say that this was the first press conference I thought was legit, handled well and might actually result in something and the fact that the media flat out ignored it reinforces that line of thought.
(post is archived)