Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 12 pts

Capitalism favors the little guy as it gives him a chance to compete. Once a company reaches a certain size and market dominance, free market capitalism becomes a disadvantage. This is when the company calls for more regulation to keep the little guy out or for downright communism (where the company will be in charge).

[–] • 4 pts

the gas companies did exactly this. they regulated more expensive environmental policies for gas stations. knowing that doing so will kill all small gas stations leaving them with no competition

[–] • 1 pt

Which is why we should of protected our right to live in a capitalistic society rather than a fascist one.

Regulations licenses qualifications and intellectual property rights are all anti free market capitalism.

Capitalism is the absence of any systems. The absence of state interference. Where individual people own the means of production.

As soon as the state has the power to dictate and tax economic activity they become the nominal owners of the means of production or in the case of communism outright owners

[–] • 0 pt

So did the banks, payment processors, tech companies, hospitals, mining companies, fishing companies, telecom companies...

[–] • -1 pt

You suck. Seriously you're a retarded commie.

"free market capitalism is bad because NOT FUKING FREE MARKET CAPITALISM regulations are used to destroy competitors."

Do you grasp how idiotic your statement was?

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

If that's how you read my post then you have a problem with reading comprehension.

[–] • 0 pt

Free market capitalism becomes a disadvantage. This is when a company calls for regulation which DOES NOT EXIST in a free market capitalist society.

You clearly don't know shit about economics and should Stfu rather than serve evil

[–] • 5 pts

Communism is a system for overthrowing the power structure of a nation by weaponizing the resentment of the lower class.

[–] • 4 pts

Because, in their minds, they will remain above the fray and safe from the consequences of their decisions.

[–] • 2 pts

Commucvnts murdered their own. They elevated the rich.

Stalin was the richest man in human history.

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] • 2 pts

Stalin was the richest man in human history.

You're expecting modern-day Communists / Socialists to have a clue about history?

[–] • 1 pt

I like to taunt them because I loathe them so fuking much.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

It's about power more than wealth. The only way these bureaucrats, politicians and billionaires can obtain more power is to centralise all political control under their rule. All communist revolutions are financed by wealthy bankers anyway, it's a myth that they are grassroots movements.

Their useful idiots, the lowest people in society, the ugly, stupid, useless, in return get status and privileges for their loyalty. So in effect you have the very top weaponising the very bottom against anyone else. Look up Bio-Leninism.

Think of your average communist tech bugman. What status would he have in a natural order society? Or even a feudal society? These people know they are very low on natural hierarchies which is why communism appeals to them as it allows them to climb a hierarchy that rewards their political loyalty. It's why we can spot communists just by their appearance.

[–] • 2 pts

Communism is just another term for totalitarianism. Where a very small group of people have everything and the super mass majority of their slaves/subjects fight over scraps and trash.

The super wealthy push it because they believe they'll be a part of the 3-5% who have everything and because there is no avenue (outside of civil war / revolution) that their wealth and power will never be contested.

[–] • 2 pts

Because it means they get to ban people from having private property. That formerly private property is then "state property" which in reality means it is the private property of those same wealthy/powerful people.

[–] • 2 pts

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

They use a prosperous 'equality' argument to gain the most important thing they need, control.

[–] • 1 pt

All wealth stems from people.

Capitalism gives no ownership over people that isn't voluntarily given or withdrawn.

Socialism allows for the ownership of people therefor wealth

[–] • 1 pt

Communism always results in an entrenched oligarchy. They think theyll keep or gain power.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

communism is secular judaism, it says one thing and then does the opposite

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It's not supposed to be for them. It's for the little people.

[–] • 0 pt

Lolz.

Little people. You will own Nothing. We the rulers will own everything. This is for you wink wink nudge nudge.

Face it. Socialists of any creed are retarded dupes.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Communism favors the rich if they play the surface level carebear game while its being instituted.

They insulate themselves while everyone gets poorer and they get richer because their wealth gets grandfathered in. Everyone is more desperate for their grandfathered resources so they get richer by exploiting capitalism and then switching to communism when they hit a plateau.

This is the Bolshevik playbook, the same one that made men like Hitler when they imported it to Germany.

Load more (12 replies)