WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

421

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/572861-clinton-lawyers-indictment-reveals-bag-of-tricks

  • Sussmann lied to the FBI when he approached them with documents allegedly proving Trump's link to Moscow via the Alpha Bank server - He told them he wasn't representing anyone in the matter
  • Sussmann came clean during his testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel in Dec 2017 -- stating his meeting with the FBI was at the 'volition of a client' (Clinton Campaign)
  • Researchers hired by Perkins Coie law firm who were attempting to cobble together a plausible story linking Trump to Alpha Bank said they needed to use everything in their 'bag of tricks'
  • Jake Sullivan, who worked for Hillary's campaign, pushed the fake Alpha Bank story to the press -- Sullivan now is the National Security Advisor for Joe Biden
  • Mueller conveniently ignored the Alpha Bank Story in his Special Counsel investigation of alleged Trump-Russian collusion
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/572861-clinton-lawyers-indictment-reveals-bag-of-tricks * Sussmann lied to the FBI when he approached them with documents allegedly proving Trump's link to Moscow via the Alpha Bank server - He told them he wasn't representing anyone in the matter * Sussmann came clean during his testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel in Dec 2017 -- stating his meeting with the FBI was at the 'volition of a client' (Clinton Campaign) * Researchers hired by Perkins Coie law firm who were attempting to cobble together a plausible story linking Trump to Alpha Bank said they needed to use everything in their 'bag of tricks' * Jake Sullivan, who worked for Hillary's campaign, pushed the fake Alpha Bank story to the press -- Sullivan now is the National Security Advisor for Joe Biden * Mueller conveniently ignored the Alpha Bank Story in his Special Counsel investigation of alleged Trump-Russian collusion

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

I am confused as to why this story is coming out, and even more confused about why an outfit like The Hill would run it. They're certainly not going to indict Hillary for anything. I sincerely doubt Sullivan will get anything more than a wrist slap. What's the long con here?

[–] 2 pts

"Look over here", the illusionist said, moving the spectators focus away.

[–] 2 pts

"Look over here", the illusionist said, moving the spectators focus away.

Misdirection is the only reason I can come up with, too.

[–] 1 pt

Misdirection

The cat and the laser pointer.

[–] 1 pt

1 - a distraction from jewden hate 2 - to give the anti-Trump, kike shills something to shill against

What's the long con here?

They hold this guy out as the source of the "misinformation" and therefore no one else involved is guilty. They were just naively deceived by Sussmann and won't be prosecuted.

[–] 0 pt

Sussmann may not be the big fish here -- the indictment implicates a Senior IT expert and possibly even Fusion GPS.

The reason for the timing of the Sussmann indictment is because they ran up against the statue of limitations and had to file it before it ran out. Also, Mark Elias oddly resigned from Perkins Coie recently. So, we may not have seen the last of the indictments.

Sussmann may not be the big fish here

I agree 100%. My point is they blame some little guy (sacrificial lamb) and the guys further up the food chain claim he bamboozled them.

[–] 0 pt

Jonathan Turley wrote the article.........

[–] 0 pt

Jonathan Turley wrote the article.

Understood, but he publishes his own stuff. Why would the Hill be party to anything against their favorite presidential candiate?

[–] 1 pt

Perhaps they are starting to distance a bit from Biden & co? Don't know

[–] 0 pt

They know none of this matters, if you surveyed half of all liberals they would tell you that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians despite mountains of evidence proving otherwise. The information war was already won and there is no correction they would be willing to hear and consider