First of all nigger, that's not the constitution. Secondly, you know dam well that topic is infected with unconstitutional rulings and plenty of legal scholars plainly said he has no such authority. They say this because it's clearly not constitutional. Additionally, they wouldn't say this if separation of powers even hints at what you claim.
Now that we've confirmed you're just a fag, we don't have much to discuss.
You're just some fag who likes to play lawyer.
First of all nigger, that's not the constitution. Secondly, you know dam well that topic is infected with unconstitutional rulings and plenty of legal scholars plainly said he has no such authority. They say this because it's clearly not constitutional. Additionally, they wouldn't say this if separation of powers even hints at what you claim.
Now that we've confirmed you're just a fag, we don't have much to discuss.
You're just some fag who likes to play lawyer.
Ohhhhh I see what the problem is now. You think that the Constitution means whatever you think it means regardless of what it actually means. Enlightening.
Ohhhhh I see what the problem is now. You think that the Constitution means whatever you think it means regardless of what it actually means. Enlightening.
Learn to read fag
Learn to read fag
(post is archived)