Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Degenerate women & men are already lost, and whatever relationship they have will be some kind of a failure. It's the "boring" guys & girls, that are capable of making proper families rather than being dead-ends, that are the true targets for ethnic transmogrification. The exceptions amongst blacks (to typical negroid behaviour) are the ones that are most likely to win over conservative whites romantically.

I think my main point is that the majority of Christians are full on colour-blind civnats, who do not value what makes our European nations unique, they do not value what can so easily be lost and given, as a fragment, to another people. There is Biblical writing against miscegenation, but it only applies to physical "Israel," and they argue that it is a cultural issue anyway despite the obvious.

[–] • 1 pt

American Nationalism is purely constitutional and i'm not on par with its Masonic roots.

[–] • 0 pt

Sooooo ... give america back to the mexicans and the french then?

[–] • 0 pt

That jogger bitch is on the screen too long. Couldn't watch.

[–] • 0 pt

The United States is not a nation, it is a confederacy of multiple nations. American Nationalism is doomed to failure for this reason.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Anglos and Saxons were different tribes/ nations to the Celtic tribes.

There were many cases like this across Europe. What matters is whether they are the same genotype or there is too much genetic disparity, and whether there is cultural & linguistic overlap or not.

[–] • 0 pt

Rome did pretty good. Flawed premise

[–] • 0 pt

Rome was a different situation though. The tribes which came together to form Rome had a long history and their own ethnic identities and maintained those identities. America has very little identity left besides the one manufactured in the early 20th Century. Maybe regionalism can take over, but with weaponized migration, that is in doubt.

[–] • 0 pt

Europeans have more than a thousand year history together.

America was just the overflow apparently.

[–] • 0 pt

If you like nationalism, wait till you hear about ethnonationalism.

[–] • 1 pt

A nation is a group of people with common language, culture, traditions (religion) and ethnicity. How is ethno-nationalism different from nationalism?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

One factors in the (((new Europeans))) in mainstream media and is more about the economical aspects the way things are portrayed

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Ethno-Nationalism was simply Nationalism. There was no such thing as a "Ethno-State" prior to recent times, the Jews renamed "Nation-State" to "Ethno-State" to imply that it was separate from Nationalism, that Civnattery was true Nationalism, and Ethno-states were a somewhat historically rare/ controversial concept. Although, even if you had a Nation-State for your Nation, that didn't necessarily mean that individuals of other nations couldn't assimilate into your Nation. But that's proper genetic assimilation into the Nation. It ought to be the Nation's choice as to whether such a thing is allowed and to what degree it is allowed.

Prior to Israel, the Jews were considered to be a "Stateless Nation" rather than something that ever properly assimilated.