The next sentence said that the rest of the independent stock would not all be voted, but their blocks would. Hence, you got a slate of 3 board members elected against the wishes of the current board.
The next sentence said that the rest of the independent stock would not all be voted, but their blocks would. Hence, you got a slate of 3 board members elected against the wishes of the current board. [Seems pretty controlling to me.](https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/bill-sardi/who-runs-the-world-blackrock-and-vanguard/)
But those 3 board members have no vote because they won't vote along the same lines as management which has more seats at the table. At best these 3 dick holes are there to break a split decision. When 80% of the board votes along the same line they are effectively powerless. Now, not only are they powerless, but have demonstrated that they are unfit to lead.
Activists = bottom tier shills.
But those 3 board members have no vote because they won't vote along the same lines as management which has more seats at the table. At best these 3 dick holes are there to break a split decision. When 80% of the board votes along the same line they are effectively powerless. Now, not only are they powerless, but have demonstrated that they are unfit to lead.
Activists = bottom tier shills.
(post is archived)