WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

I watched a lot of video from that event, and I saw a lot of shouting and a few hot heads, but I also saw people stepping in to rescue others (including a cop) when stuff was getting sketchy. Generally it looked like White Americans protesting about something, and by that I mean fat people in camo standing around holding coffee cups like it was a Sunday barbecue.

To call that an insurrection seems to lack any proof of a wider organisation and intent. These were all just random unarmed fat people on a day out, they even walked between the velvet ropes FFS

Certainly no comparison to AntiFa throwing rocks and petrol bombs and burning a court house.

It definitely did fool some people in the UK, I had a friend who referred to it as an insurrection, I actually lost a lot of respect for her intelligence that day. Being "angry inside a State building" does not mean you have collectively decided to take over the running of the country by force, the whole gaslighting concept the media are trying to push is a fucking joke.

[–] 0 pt

The FBI should already have all the plans for organization and intent since they authored them.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

I don't buy anything in that film, she's dead

[–] 0 pt

Dont buy that there were goverment and non govt provocateurs there? Anyone with a ballcap and an assault kit bag with the DHSMC haircuts in the footage is a fed.

Anyone in any position of authority who calls that an insurrection is a traitor and should be dealt with as such. Make of that what you will.

[–] 0 pt

The only benefit to calling it that is it exposes the sheep and traitors to the rest of us

The zombies that call it that will be the proxy force that attacks you so that the tyrants don't have to get their hands dirty.

[–] 1 pt

I always ask the people treating it like a take over attempt if they actually believe that was really going to take over the US and start issuing orders to the police and military, who would then not question it at all and do what he wishes.

They usually don't have a response and try to deflect, but it's especially fun when they answer "yes"

[–] 0 pt

To put it in perspective, I never once heard the 30 year long paramilitary campaign by the IRA to depose the governments of both jurisdictions on the island of Ireland described as an insurrection. Not sure why it wasn’t now I think of it, except maybe the governments of neither jurisdiction considered attempts by the IRA to usurp political power through force to be a legitimate threat to their positions. Unlike those lil ol’ ladies and unarmed larpers who took on the world’s most powerful government for a few hours I guess.

You realize that’s their goal and they are successful at it, right?

[–] 0 pt

Unarmed nonviolent nonsurrection..unn

[–] 0 pt

You mean the nonviolent unarmed nonsurrection?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

"Intentional lie" is too polite a term. What it actually is, is pure bullshit.

[–] 0 pt

It is their holocaust. They were begging for anything from us for several years and this is the best they could get from us. It did not stop them from revising the shit out of it to suit their interests.