According to Wickard v. Filburn, a farmer growing food for his own consumption can be regulated under the interstate commerce clause because by growing his own food he isn't buying it from elsewhere, affecting interstate commerce.
According to Wickard v. Filburn, a farmer growing food for his own consumption can be regulated under the interstate commerce clause because by growing his own food he isn't buying it from elsewhere, affecting interstate commerce.
One of the worst rulings in the history of a court with plenty of bad rulings to choose from. I'd love to see it challenged by a real lawyer.
One of the worst rulings in the history of a court with plenty of bad rulings to choose from. I'd love to see it challenged by a real lawyer.
All the bad rulings, and some "good" ones have all gone as they were meant to. The entire system is corrupted and has been for a loooong fucking time.
All the bad rulings, and some "good" ones have all gone as they were meant to. The entire system is corrupted and has been for a loooong fucking time.
Since Wilson was president at the latest.
Since Wilson was president at the latest.
Yeah. That was a very bad ruling.
Like citizen united and the obamacare ruling.
Yeah. That was a very bad ruling.
Like citizen united and the obamacare ruling.
(post is archived)