It's easier to fraud through than 1 person 1 vote.
Election fraud shouldn't be conflated with election fairness.
Just like the sham argument of claiming that requiring voter ID (key to help preventing election fraud) will inhibit illiterate blacks from voting (election fairness.)
It's a bad faith argument intended to maintain the status quo.
I never conflated the two. Not once. I stated one thing and compared (conflated) it to nothing else. So what the fuck are you even trying to say? Because it doesn't apply to anything I posted.
Now, don't get your panties in a bunch. Clearly I have no idea what you were trying to say in your first comment.
My apologies for attempting to decipher your cryptic use of the English language. :)
You have no proof of that.
Not everyone is always going to vote for howefver many candidates they are allowed to rank. Due to laziness, a false sense of honest (I don't know who's what so I'm only voting for my #1!!!) etc. This can easily be frauded by filling in the otherwise blank spots with chosen candidates.
If the # of spots for ranking is 3, and you have a population of 100, then there should be 300 votes. However if 50 people only vote for 2, 20 people for 1, and 30 for all 3 we get 210 votes where 90 can be filled in.
There. That's fucking simple.
Simple and wrong.
(post is archived)