Your comments are pretty good crunchy, so feel free to think aloud around me.
I have sometimes asked people around here to not engage in Wehrmachtzersetzung which is literally military defeatism which was punishable for a while in Germany. They are psyching us out through the culture. We can create our own culture which shuts them out. To an extent thats what we have done here on sites like Poal, but what is the point when we keep passing the poison pill to ourselves. I think theres a good chance that some of the voices here are in fact agents sent to demoralize. We must root out and ostracize the members that excessively black pill.
So you know I focus alot on evolution and we’ve had some discussions on the subject. Your winner/loser paradigm makes sense in that context, and migh parallel some male female dynamics and also some social hierarchy dynamics within a society.
We are all vying for reproductive success as individuals but we are also part of these colony creatures called societies and we must balance our individual interests with the well being of society. Societies that have alot of members with high altruism can succeed as long as they are not infiltrated by deceivers and opportunists, which is what we have now.
Maybe loser thinking has its place in a genetically homogeneous society, because everybody can’t be chief. Somebody’s got to be at the bottom of the hierarchy. Its better for the society if they can accept that place peacefully like a good loser, so perhaps having a loser mode is good for society if not for any individual in particular.
But if your hierarachy has been hijacked by an endogamous group of social parasites descended from some bronze age cult of priests, I think you need to build a new culture for a new society and not submit to slave status. They are master manipulators because of their unique evolution living off of other people. They are sending signals to submit to “loser think“ through the culture. They are good at it. But these are false signals. They are not us, they are not our chief.
I sometimes think about the necessity to start a new religion or movement which can spread through the culture like a mind virus and uses evolutionary concepts to ‘hack’ our society. Not necessarily evolution itself but something that implements some of the mechanisms of evolution to improve our success.
Is the ultimate goal of your theory to reshape our society or form a new hierarchy that excludes the social parasites?
I'm talking only for men, I don't know how any of this works for the female mind.
Im not sure either and I have one. But clearly we need a strategy that includes females because they are at least half the problem. Females historically often defect to other cultures (i.e. Invaders) because they see increased reproductive success or status as a consequence of a defection. This is a totally valid strategy in evolution which seems shitty, but you can’t get to sentimental about it, you just have to offer something better than the other guy.
A key feature of the parasitic strategy is to view yourself as a chronic victim even in spite of being the exploiter of others. Apparently it really works. Jews do this. Gypsies do this. Alot of “narcissistic personalities” do this.
I think that judeo-psychology trains people to think like this. It trains people to look at their adversities or flaws and try to figure out how someone else ultimately is to blame. The consequence is to demand society care for you rather that to be a spartan and suck it up and not whine. Females are obviously particularly susceptible to this. Basically they are training people in jewish strategies. None of this engages winning circuitry.
So I think its safe to say that your training should seek to undue this SJW mindset that psychothereapy has wrought.
This will take a bit to process and respond to. A few points:
You filled out all the missing pieces. I had to re-write my post a bunch of times because I was getting into the weeds of the evolutionary reasoning, you nicely summarized every single point I would have wanted to bring up ... and then a few more.
Your point about loser think circuitry being necessary in a genetical homogenous society is probably correct. I had that point in an earlier draft becuase I think it is very important. My general feeling is if it exists there is usually a very good reason why it exists. Precisely as you said, you cannot have all males vying for the alpha spot, that is an insane proposition.
Great post on parasitic cultures. I just posted these two things:
https://poal.co/s/Opinion/364288
https://poal.co/s/Videos/363462
Somewhere along the way they went through an evolutionary funnel and their entire species became something else. Once you start to see the patterns, they are everywhere. Good call on Gypsies, precisely my thoughts as well.
Pay attention to the superman video, Epstein / Weinstein are NOT a accident.
- Your point on judeo-psychology basically explains communism, feminism, sjw nonsense and all the modern movements. Once you start to notice that all of the tactics in those movements are female social warfare tactics and you notice all of those movements are started by jews and then you run into the JLP clip where that jewish woman describes judaism as bizarro world matriarchy, all of a sudden the pieces just fit.
Christianity it self is a type of judaic parasitism in the similar vein. It dis-empowers the believer into a perpetual victim that is always ready to be abused.
Once you see all of those layers, all of a sudden you start to realize there is no such thing as conservatism vs leftism. All of those are arbitrary groupings of values that have over time been influenced, as you put it, by exogenous parasitic organisms.
Once you are there, you are basically ready to just accept that political / social value systems can only be thought of as and an ever extending set of values that extends out in rings as follows: individual, man / woman, man / woman / children, extended family, town, country. Something like that, I am sure that can be refined. I say that because in all of my travels I have NEVER met a consevative or a liberal. Every single person that I have ever met has a mix of all of the value systems necessary for them to complete the survival tasks required of them at every ring of the value system.
I have to jump out of this topic at this juncture, I have A LOT to write about this.
- I am in agreement that the primary tool set is evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology. Those are the only known tools that have both, retroactive explanatory power and predictive power.
After you have engaged with the material long enough, you start to see that that the human animal can be understood at the animal / species level the way we understand dogs, cats and horses. Horses have a very specific set of evolutionary psychology requirements and breaking a horse in is a very specific thing to the very nature of a horse. Training a dog and a cat are similar but also very different.
I think that because we are so close to the subject matter it is difficult to abstract out, but, humans aren't that complicated in my opinion.
- Have you started to notice the REMARKABLE narrative consistency our people speak in on this and other forums?
For example, everything that you wrote is just filling out the missing pieces of what I wrote? As if we are writing the same book?
Have you noticed that we can go to .win or here or wherever and start pulling in self consistent narrative written by our people? As if we are collectively writing different pages of a single book?
I don't think this is an accident.
I think our yearning for our own beleif systems, our own mythology, our own religious rites is DEEEEEEPLY programmed into our genetics.
I was watching Red Ice a while back Henrik and Lana were talking respectfully about Christianity (they are such an amazing example for our people) and were just making the point that Christianity is about the submissivness of the invidual to god while our ancient religious rites had nothing to do with that. Our ancient gods and religious rites dealt with our relationship with our enviornment, teaching our children and families and passing on information from one genreation to the next, facilitating our relationships to our prey and so forth.
In other words, I am not even sure that we need to call it a religion. I think we need to just bring our people together and let all of them just write out whatever this invisible narrative embedded in our dna might be. I have the following sentence running around in my head:
" I search for our ancient gods out in the tundra, for they have been asleep for far too long ....... I hear thunder out in the distance. "
I have no idea what it means, but I don't believe it is an accident. But it is the beginning of a mythological narrative that I feel is coming on and I am going to have to write it down.
And, if once we write out the mythologies embedded in our firmware and we find our gods awakened, what would they want of us?
It feels like the the initial guiding principles of our rekindled mythology would be something like the ancient rites of spring, where the focus is on training up our men and women in preparing for taking on vows and building families.
Its just so nice to have somebody get it. I have had people indulge my evo rants on here occasionally but nobody is super interested in the topic, other than nukeisrael who is gone, and chiro, who is a christian and who I haven’t seen in a while.
Nice post about superman. You are right on. Sometimes I feel I can see their brains working. Its very interesting. There is an architecture that I am beginning to recognize since I have been hanging out in these places.
Somewhere along the way they went through an evolutionary funnel and their entire species became something else.
Yes, Ive been honing my theory on this for a while. I think you might have seen me mentioning social parasitism before. There are some very good parallels in the animal kingdom and some of them and some instances evn of parasitizing other members of the same species or genus, such as ants or bees. I also think the phenomenon described as mafia hypothesis in cuckoos is very relelvant here as well as mimicry.
I was satisfied with the social parasite model because it also fits with gypsies and irish travellers, and maybe some societies with caste systems. Jews seem to parasitize by infiltrating what I call the bureacratic layer of society. Every complex economy needs a bureacratic layer to coordinate different wealth producting sectors. The bureacracy is pure overhead and does not create wealth directly— it coordinates through cultural information— religion, laws, education, investment, etc.
When a bureacracy becomes corrupt, as it is wont to do, it becomes an exploitive aristocracy that is generally enogamous.
Jews enter a society and go straight for the bureacratic layer, because they know if they can distort information there, like values or economic information, they can live quite comfortably. The host society is not their society after all, its just the livestock.
And this is why the aristocracy and jews are such fast friends. They play the same game. The aristocracy sells out its own people over and over to jews. American, Muslim, European, African elites all love to make deals with these people.
But I was still puzzled about this funnel, the initial conditions of their inception, until a few weeks ago. I was thinking maybe it was because they were once shepherds but then it just hit me. Priests. They were priests in Sumeria.
A group of priests devoted some god— Yahweh, Marduk, Moloch, who cares— would be recruited for all the traits we see in jews. They would have bureacratic skillsets, they would have a flair for showmanship, they would be expert in theological and philosophical polemic, and to remain economically successful as a group they would have to be good at conning people out of their money. They would always be looking for an angle to get paid for the magic show. I am pretty satisfied now that they are directly descended from a corrupt priestly caste. It explains the IQ and their ridiculously ritualistic lifestyle.
So they just keep inventing religions so they can get paid for them. Christianity, communism, psychology.
Im glad you aren’t a christian because they can’t always handle some of this stuff and I don’t feel the need to destroy people’s faith when they are already so demoralized. But if you are familiar with the history of the hyksos, then you’ll understand what I mean. They did the same shit they did with the Holocaust. They attacked Egypt and then fabricated a mythology that was in complete conflict with the facts. I imagine that Jew-heavy early christianity went exactly the same way. They were even changing their names: Saul>Paul. Simon>Peter. How many of these early Christians were brainwashed goys? How many were ethnic jews?
Yes, I do feel we are on the same page because we are goys. We build our own societies, we don’t suck the blood of others. So self-abnegation and not selfindulgence is how we accomplished our civilization. People responsible for growing food and building shelter and defending their own village can’t afford to navel gaze and speculate about whether they really want to fuck their mother to their analyst. It is counterproductive. They have taught everyone to think like a jew. Which is disasterous. Everyone cant be supported like a jew. Somebody has to do the work.
We can’t afford to have them push another slave religion on us for another 2 millenia, and then blame us all over again for that religion.
We need to reform a culture and economy exclusive from other groups. But we also need to teach other groups who and what they are. Or they will do to us what we did to Germany and Palestine and many others we attacked on behalf of their ideologies.
I have nothing to add to this. It is spot on. Two points:
- I never thought about the priesthood in Sumer. Huh. I think that is probably as close as it gets and that explains jewish male submissivness, high propensity to sexual perversion and high propensity for high levels autistic analogous behaviour such as over focus on procedural and verbal detail as well as propensity to compulsiveness. Huh. Back then, sexual rites in that part of the world were all kinds of weird things, that would explain the genetic funnel as, I imagine, you wouldn't even need a huge amount of time to select for weak, low T, submissive males that have autistic like traits to have that propagate into a large enough population that is self segregating as they would have been via priesthood.
What a thought.
You know, this is one of those aha insights that just sits in front of us all and no one notices, but when they do everyone slaps their head going "how did I not see it before".
Here is another aha evolutionary biology observation of hitler, by a jewish professor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxqpq0wM3Ms
HItler was merely trying to secure more resources for his genetic kingroup. Obviously, we know all the other things those 3 people in that podcast don't want to share with anyone, but from an evolutionary standpoint, that is an aha insight similar to yours.
- The other point I wanted to address is the "when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail" thing that would the first obvious critique of a lot of what was written here. It's something that worries me, not because I can be wrong, but because I don't want to end up in the wrong place strategically.
Although I am fairly confident in what has been written so far that the raw categorization of the problem domain is probably fairly accurate, I am also aware that it is easy to walk down a set of assumptions and just come up with explanations that fit the narrative that you need to be true.
However, as we can see, both of us came up with nearly identical categorizations independently. And, we aren't the only ones. I have run into many many conversations like this where I drop two lines into the conversation and the other person just spits out most of what we just wrote.
Note: there are tools and methodologies available in the software world that can be built out to help with the error correction process if any of this was to be written down and built out in a useful framework of anysort.
I am starting to call this the Alex Jones effect. People think Alex is a conspiracy nut and is making stuff up. This isn't true at all. Alex Jones is just reading documents the elite "beurocracy" just wrote down. Everyone visualizes conspiracy as elites getting together secretly and planning everything in secret. Nothing could be further from the truth. The elites get together in the open and THEY WRITE DOWN AND TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT THEY WILL DO TO YOU. All you need to do is read their papers to find out what is being organized, why and when and how it will be executed. Alex is just a researcher (albeit, his ex is jewish and his kids are jewish ... so theres that).
Note: If anyone is wondering why Alex is the way he is, it's because he had brain damage as a kid. There is a JRE podcast where he reveals how severe it was. Anyone that knows kids that have had brain damage and survived knows that they are all changed after they recover.
Analogously, what we are discussing here are surface level observations. Our brains are picking up the patterns all around us, and we are simply writing down the surface level observations and categorizations of what is happening and why.
- Great point on the xmen observation. Not only were the xmen created by two jews ( stan lee is a jew, jack kirbys jew name is jacob kurtzberg) but the two main characters are jews (professor x and magneto). I grew up reading x-men, i am utterly disgusted by the notion I grew up reading jew nonsense.
(post is archived)