WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

I am as suspicious of the spic as anyone, but I'll take a win where I can get one.

This guy has the gift of the gab. THIS is what a true leader needs to be talking about. Explaining the operational situation in an entertaining way and painting the vision for the future.

We don't have any leadership, if Nick is it for now, I'll take it.

I am as suspicious of the spic as anyone, but I'll take a win where I can get one. This guy has the gift of the gab. THIS is what a true leader needs to be talking about. Explaining the operational situation in an entertaining way and painting the vision for the future. We don't have any leadership, if Nick is it for now, I'll take it.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

>Some of your winner/loser circuitry kinda reminded me of what JP said about the lobsters and serotonin. You know what Im talking about?

Absolutely. It's really amazing to think about how much hard wiring we have in place. You don't have to be an expert in IT but it certainly helps in thinking about some of this. In IT everything is, more or less, built out of discrete systems and subsystems and the distinction between what is a subsystem and what isn't gets blurry if you ask the right questions. So, before I make the point that it just seems to me that our brains seem to be hard wired with A LOT of interconnected subsystems, I wanted to point out that it would probably be very easy to argue that there is no distinction between subsystems. It's just that, if you start categorizing brain function into discrete and overlapping interconnected subsystems, you get retroactive explanatory and predictive power so even if it isn't perfectly accurate it is useful. It blows my mind that our brains have dedicted circuitry for music and that a lot of our mental subsystems have dedicated lifecycle and use requirements. For example, cognitive abilities like speech HAVE AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT of exposure to speech by the age of five to a minimum number of hours or the brain will prune the circuitry and the children will not be able to develop cognitively. There are a ton of videos online of children that were not wanted at birth, locked in closets for the first 10 years of their life and when found at the age of 10 or whatever, although they had no genetic disorders were functionally retarded simply because of the abuse of being locked in a closet, or a cage or a room for the first 10 years of their life without the minimum number of hours of language exposure that they needed.

> What I really think is that sometimes they are conspiring. And sometimes they are doing shit out in the open, as you say. But often it is just jews carrying out their genetic programing in a situational context. They have done this before, taken over sombody else’s country. There’s a routine that is called, they sense it is time to attack by subtle cues in the culture. The same way we share many ideas I suppose.

> I doubt they see it as attacking and exploiting. Im sure they really believe the whole world is better off being run by communists who all just happen to be jews. Its one of those special traits. They were not selected for a guilty conscience.

Absolutely. I think the difficult part of communicating these ideas is that it is difficult to provide easy / interesting / useful / fun entry points to this stuff. First, just to acknowledge that yes, I agree that there are real conspiracies. People do get together all the time and agree to conspire on all kinds of things. On the other hand, spontaneous network effects can generate intelligence, solutions and complexity that is hard for us to wrap our heads around. For example, fire ants survive floods by creating floating structures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2ZysgGAABw

Do jews believe what they are doing is evil? No, of course not, for all of the exact reasons you posted. At a religious level, they have a book that tells them they are special, unique and god gifted them the planet and a bunch of animals that walk on two feet that will be their slaves. At the individual and cognitive level they have all sorts of features that basically makes them a different species of human because of all the things we already mentioned but also because in my experience they don't even look at the world the same way as a normal human being does. They seem to see the world as a set of abstract symbolic forms kind of like a programmer or a mathematician does. When you see the world that way, the world is just an abstract game and you have no connection to it, you can do virtually anything you want. At the level of spontaneous network effects, you don't need to even speak to your people to be able to collaborate, you will know what to do and how to do it just by being in proximity of your people, you will fit in and just adjust for your survival preference baked into your genome.

[–] 0 pt

, fire ants survive floods by creating floating structures:

It seems so hard to believe that there is that kind of planning in the ant brain. But the program is probably highly situational i.e. One use case and not a lot of variables in the requirements. I used to wonder why black people always steal shit. People insist its societal problems because how could anyone be genetically programmed to steal cars or mug people. Black people do it almost exclusively. They seem to think its normal. Many do anyway.

They seem to see the world as a set of abstract symbolic forms kind of like a programmer or a mathematician does.

So interesting. Chiro and I were discussing this shit (communication/coordination through the culture) and the conversation turned to starling murmurations. The instruction or argument, to use the programming metaphor again, is succint —-then off they go to jew shit up.

I hope you continue to develop this idea of winning and losing circuitry. I love your systematic thinking! Is that too forward? ;-)

[–] 0 pt

>I hope you continue to develop this idea of winning and losing circuitry. I love your systematic thinking! Is that too forward?

Not at all. We have to start to actually do stuff soon, talk is cheap.

It is starting to become obvious that we need some of these built:

  • A truth machine to document and test ideas.

  • Collaborative training where we can start to create micro courses that people can take and start to practice on their own.

  • Explore other options for our people.

It's easy to talk shit on here, quite another to do something about it. Everything we spoke about also fits into a much larger set of global challenges:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJSD8XV3qzE

We have to feed, clothe and employ our people and give them tools to protect them selves and their children from our enemies. The conversations here are interesting for how much buy in ideas get and for any testing for truth value as we have vocal participants.

Let's see how much is possible.

[–] 0 pt

A truth machine to document and test ideas.

Can you eleborate on that? Do you mean a literal machine?