WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

897

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Explain to me how that's a bad thing.

In the letter, Hobbs said her office “consulted with election technology and security experts, including at the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, regarding the appropriate next steps, and each unanimously advised that once election officials lose custody and control over voting systems and components, those devices should not be reused in further elections.”

It's frightening how stupid the people in charge of election security are. They're not worried about not having admin rights to the machines, and they're not worried about the machines being accessible on the public internet, but they're too stupid to know how to verify that the machine is in the same state when it returns as it was when it left. God help us all.

[–] 0 pt

They aren't stupid, they are corrupt and want plausible deniability.

[–] 0 pt

It's not, it's good. Does anyone trust the "cyber ninjas"?

[–] 1 pt

Not any more or less than I trust Dominion. Any test that can certify the machines after being delivered by Dominion is surely good enough to certify them upon their return from Cyber Ninjas. If her office doesn't have the capability to detect a hardware compromise they have no business certifying any machine from anywhere.