Currency doesnt need intrinsic value if it is a secure medium of exchange.
Without something intrinsic, what is the value of it? I agree that currencies don't need intrinsic value since their purpose is just transfer of value, not storage of it.
I prefer my money without counterparty risk to be a store of value over time
Au and Ag.
I own lots of Au and Ag, I understand why they have value.
Crypto doesn't need intrinsic value beyond its nature of being secure, fungible, and portable. As long as the block chain exists your crypto is as secure as your pass phrase. You can travel anywhere with your pass phrase in your head and as long as the network is accessible at your destination you can access your money. This strikes me as a good thing, a useful tool.
Raoul Pal did an interesting video for Real Finance where he talks about the value of networks. For example if you are the only person on Facebook it has zero value but as the network grows its value increases.
There are no doubt limits to growth and diminishing returns but we are currently seeing a growth phase. Bitcoin may be the next Myspace or it may be the backbone of a global currency system and the early adopters are being rewarded for foresight and stomach for risk.
Holding Bitcoin isn't owning part of the network. The value of the network is separate.
early adopters are being rewarded for foresight and stomach for risk.
How are they investing in the network? It's a bunch of opportunists hoping for an even more greedy opportunist to buy their coins at a higher price. See NFTs.
I know less about NFTs than I do about cryptos but they do seem even more speculative than crypto, but I am the kind of guy that would be as happy with a copy of a piece of art as I would the original. The argument for NFTs seems to be a claim on an original piece which seems very ephemeral to me. There are better investments for sure but then there doesn't seem a shortage of people with more money than sense
They may be investing in other ways such as hardware to strengthen the network. Maybe some people are just in for a pump and dump.
Sure holding BTC isn't owning part of the network anymore than having a facebook page is the same as owning facebook but people are deriving value from the network all the same. Facebook doesn't appeal to me, I tried it and it was shit but lots of people do derive value added to their lives through using it, similarly BTC isn't for everyone. Not everyone needs crypto but that doesn't mean it doesn't have value.
Money represents a store of value of human endeavors. Whether storing the value of digging up gold or the accounting effort of recording transactions is largely a matter of personal preference.
What else has a track record like those two metals? They also have actual uses, physically exist, and are naturally scarce.
(post is archived)