Except not even close
Except not even close
You claimed scarcity makes gold valuable, and for a while made seashells valuable (until they became non-scarce). Why do you argue scarcity does not make bitcoin valuable?
You claimed scarcity makes gold valuable, and for a while made seashells valuable (until they became non-scarce). Why do you argue scarcity does not make bitcoin valuable?
I didn't say bitcoin didn't have value. I said it doesn't have inherent value
I didn't say bitcoin didn't have value. I said it doesn't have inherent value
No you didn't. I went through your comments and this is the first time you've said "inherent value" or anything even similar this week.
And even if you had, that doesn't address the flaw in your argument. Earlier you claimed scarcity makes things valuable, then when I pointed out that bitcoin is scarce you said it doesn't count. Why not?
No you didn't. I went through your comments and this is the first time you've said "inherent value" or anything even similar this week.
And even if you had, that doesn't address the flaw in your argument. Earlier you claimed scarcity makes things valuable, then when I pointed out that bitcoin is scarce you said it doesn't count. Why not?
(post is archived)