WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

689

Looking for constructive criticism, point out problems and offer alternatives, recommend changes, ask for clarification as to reasons for why i put down what I did, or for a better explanation on what I mean by something I've written.

Looking for constructive criticism, point out problems and offer alternatives, recommend changes, ask for clarification as to reasons for why i put down what I did, or for a better explanation on what I mean by something I've written.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Forcing all the immigrants into a country with no military and then "protecting" that country with what will basically be a closed border mostly white nation will not be ok to the normies at all. They are way too far gone to accept such policies.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

as I wrote in the prologue, I'm trying to satisfy the desires of both sides of the issue, support for open borders is mostly in the east, and so the east gets open borders, the rest of the country is a bit more conservative, so it's fair that they get the closed borders they overwhelmingly wanted in the recent anonymous survey.

The advocates for immigration talk about a few arguments:

  • the immigrants are fleeing persecution, not letting them in is dangerous for them.

So they aren't being sent back.

  • the immigrants want to maintain their cultural and legal practices in the new home. So I'm giving them the power to make whatever sort of country they want.

and so on.

I'm going down the list of arguments and satisfying all of them, while at the same time satisfying the desires of the areas which would prefer a more closed immigration policy, can't get more closed than "closed completely".

ok, enough bullshitting.

I really don't know much about designing policy, but I figured the best way to motivate you guys to help design a system is for me to make one of my own first, then have you edit it into your own thing.

kind of like how jack and tyler durden got fight club started by fighting each other first, leading by example.

[–] 0 pt

Its not that i take issue with your system. Im just telling you than any attempt to implement it would be framed as white supremacists ruling over and abusing minorities and immigrants. I actually like the idea. But if somehow it were to take place the worlds media would frame it as genocidal evil and attack north west canada for it.

My concern is not what the widely distrusted media would think about anything, my concern is whether I can get enough citizens to vote for my party, which proposes this system.

The only important thing is getting this party into power in my country, by which I don't mean winning, but instead making it prominent enough to gather a large group of similarly minded people together, so they start talking to each other, that is the power of alt-right rallies and donald trump, not the political subject itself, but the fact that it was a gathering call and head count for dissident minds unsatisfied with the current state of affairs.

I want friends to be made, ideas and contact info to be exchanged, and organization to occur, it's not secret that a lot of the wins during 2016 was due to how dissidents were able to meet with one another IRL because they knew where they could find each other. We have become overly accustomed to living online, and we need offline organizations to achieve something.

That is why I want to make a dissident party that can get people crowded together.