Wouldn't evolution mean that different peoples evolved to fit different environments. Superiority would be based on the environment compared against.
This, evolution doesn't mean smarter. Not if being dumb is an advantage. Some ancient sculls found in Africa show massive brains (Bostock man) who were wiped out by nogs. More scientifically brains use alot of energy, make birth difficult and offspring take longer to develop, all strong evolutionary drivers.
Europeans have some Neanderthal dna, Chinee have Denisovan (cousin of NDLs) dna. Nogs all have some (like 20%) mystery pre-human dna that no one else does.
https://curiosmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Denisovan-skulls.jpg
Theres something to body size to brain size ratio too.
And the folds. And the further development forward.
What you're saying if evolution is true.
If what is happening is a genetic experiment that repeats until a solution is found, those who can never find the solution will not ever do anything different and those who are capable of doing something different are destined to get 'out' to something greater. That can't be changed, no matter how many times retards burn the house down before you can get to work.
Different people evolved for different reasons and somehow some ended up clearly better at surviving in a modern civilization while others are inherently better at destroying it. Is that not clear enough?
(post is archived)