Barter I suppose. But even then, someone might need to borrow some honey and nuts to start their own granola brand, so it would be an object based Capital instead of monetary one. I see the misuse of the term Capitalism as one of the many mental roadblocks put up by the Powers That Be to keep people confused and unable to properly articulate ideas. For example, you have these rabid Leftist morons "protesting" Capitalism in favor of Communism- when in fact Communism is actually pure Capitalism that simply excludes the bottom tier of society from opportunity. The fucking retards will never understand this because they have been programmed with faulty language.

I disagree with the OP. Capitalism implies that the capital is in private hands. However, I agree that you can have a capitalist command economy. In other words, the government picks winners which in turn support the state, but the government does not own the capital. I think this is how China does things. They don't have any of this capital sharing nonsense; their corps are owned by individuals and shareholders, but the government doesn't allow a totally free market. Rather, business success is heavily intertwined with control of the government apparatus.