WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

129

I doubt there will be nukes.

On account of the fact the u.s. military would get steamrolled in ukraine without them.

It's why the u.s. is arming the separatists.

You think biden, his circle of jewish warhawks and the shitshow running the pentagon wouldn't immediately show up, brass balls in tow, squaking for a real fight if they thought they could get away with it? Of course they would. 1. nothing to lose in terms of lives if they thought they could win 2. money to be made, if they thought they could win.

And yet, here the u.s. is, arming separatists.

Because the u.s. can't win in that theater, and thats not the intention anyway.

The intention is to suck russia into a provocation that makes it look like russia is the aggressor. Thats pretty much the only way the u.s. will be able to justify rallying nato.

The right move here is for russia to meet tit for tat and arm their own separatists. And also to fund u.s. journalists abroad to document u.s. backed insurgents and any war crimes those insurgents commit.

This is still a war of perceptions on the international stage. Of course it wouldn't look like that from the Russian perspective. It would look like another life-and-death encirclement by toothless u.s. proxy, nato. And that "life-or-death" perception is what u.s. war planners are counting on to cause the russians to react first.

Maybe I'm mistaken though.

Maybe if the russians don't act first, the administration of the u.s, soon up to its eyeballs in a collapsing economy, and desperate for a distraction, takes it as a green light to overstep its bounds even further. Maybe the old order of u.s based internationalism sees this as moment that will decide between its hegemony in a unipolar world going forward for a little while longer (a few decades of "empty gas tank / running on fumes" diplomacy), or what finally ushers in the beginnings of a multipolar regime of competing powers.

I doubt there will be nukes. On account of the fact the u.s. military would get steamrolled in ukraine without them. It's why the u.s. is arming the separatists. You think biden, his circle of jewish warhawks and the shitshow running the pentagon wouldn't immediately show up, brass balls in tow, squaking for a real fight if they thought they could get away with it? Of course they would. 1. nothing to lose in terms of lives if they thought they could win 2. money to be made, if they thought they could win. And yet, here the u.s. is, arming separatists. Because the u.s. can't win in that theater, and thats not the intention anyway. The intention is to suck russia into a provocation that makes it look like russia is the aggressor. Thats pretty much the only way the u.s. will be able to justify rallying nato. The right move here is for russia to meet tit for tat and arm their own separatists. And also to fund u.s. journalists abroad to document u.s. backed insurgents and any war crimes those insurgents commit. This is still a war of perceptions on the international stage. Of course it wouldn't look like that from the Russian perspective. It would look like another life-and-death encirclement by toothless u.s. proxy, nato. And that "life-or-death" perception is what u.s. war planners are counting on to cause the russians to react first. Maybe I'm mistaken though. Maybe if the russians don't act first, the administration of the u.s, soon up to its eyeballs in a collapsing economy, and desperate for a distraction, takes it as a green light to overstep its bounds even further. Maybe the old order of u.s based internationalism sees this as moment that will decide between its hegemony in a unipolar world going forward for a little while longer (a few decades of "empty gas tank / running on fumes" diplomacy), or what finally ushers in the beginnings of a multipolar regime of competing powers.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The bible is a collection of visions, where visions are even possible, combine with parables that tell a broader truth about the operation and cycles that civilizations go through.

If we're going in that direction, I have some interesting anecdotes to share. First, if there is even a shred of credibility at all to the cia, or at least its predecessors: they declassified their interview of uri geller, and claimed he did in fact correctly predict almost all the objects in their test, and that at the time they classified it and lied to the public because of the implications. I guess it makes sense from a purely theoretical standpoint that "remote viewing" and "visions of the future" might be possible if there is any reason to believe in retrocasuality at all. Many scientists claim the arrow of time is an epiphenomenon, rather than a real dimension, and many physics equations can be run forward or backwards in simulation. I don't mean to hand wave or invoke 'woo' strictly speaking. Only to suggest there is the potentiality that theres a kernal of truth there.

On the personal level, and this doesn't mean much if you're a skeptic, but I started out as an atheist until I had several things happen in my family that I still can't explain: I was staying with my aunt over the summer decades ago. She was leaving to pick up my cousin, and had an ominous feeling while leaving. She adamantally did not want to take my other cousin with her. The car would be full. And the only place she would have been able to sit would have been in the middle seat.

She got in a horrible accident on the way back.

The car was crushed down the middle.

Had my cousin came, she would have had to sit in the middle seat, and would not be alive today.

A powerful and disturbing gut feeling.

That is the only difference between my cousin being alive or dead today.

I also dreamed of my sister, standing on a ship stranded in a train yard built on a lake bed, in the middle of a dry dusty wasteland. On the haul, in russian was the word for "birth". She was pregnant in the dream. I told her about it.

A month later I found out she was pregnant. She'd been trying for two years. And I just so happen to have a dream a month prior.

The third instance, and mind you, this is out of dozens of predictive dreams over the years, my mother woke up one day and had a dream of a man sneaking in the window and dragging my younger sister away. She had this dream over and over, three or four times a week, for months.

That summer we caught a man trying to sneak in her window but didn't catch him in time. He later snuck into a neighbors window and tried to kidnap our neighbors daughter.

I think there is some truth to the prophecies and predictions in the bible. Whether it is 100%, or a collection of visions and insights is another matter. We are however definitely living in extraordinary times.

[–] 1 pt

Omg. That's incredible. The stories you shared. I can share a few myself but it's along the same lines as what you went through. I Definitely believe that our gut feeling is an intervention of some kind from our creator.
As far as the end times go, it's playing out in many ways. I have heard about the remote viewing things before and find it fascinating. I think our survival before tech depended heavily on intuition etc. Thanks for sharing. I'm happy you aren't an atheist anymore.

[–] 1 pt

I think our survival before tech depended heavily on intuition etc. Thanks for sharing. I'm happy you aren't an atheist anymore.

Yup. Ain't no atheists in a foxhole. And the whole world has become one. Been a foxhole for years.

Shits been going bizarro world for some time. If I were an evangelical, I'd half believe the big-A Antichrist had arrived.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Supposedly the jews believe he's here already but its their messiah but for Christians the anti christ. There was a video I saw of rabbies kissing this guy's ring and hundreds of people filming him. He fulfilled one of their prophesies. Creepy