Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I doubt there will be nukes.

On account of the fact the u.s. military would get steamrolled in ukraine without them.

It's why the u.s. is arming the separatists.

You think biden, his circle of jewish warhawks and the shitshow running the pentagon wouldn't immediately show up, brass balls in tow, squaking for a real fight if they thought they could get away with it? Of course they would. 1. nothing to lose in terms of lives if they thought they could win 2. money to be made, if they thought they could win.

And yet, here the u.s. is, arming separatists.

Because the u.s. can't win in that theater, and thats not the intention anyway.

The intention is to suck russia into a provocation that makes it look like russia is the aggressor. Thats pretty much the only way the u.s. will be able to justify rallying nato.

The right move here is for russia to meet tit for tat and arm their own separatists. And also to fund u.s. journalists abroad to document u.s. backed insurgents and any war crimes those insurgents commit.

This is still a war of perceptions on the international stage. Of course it wouldn't look like that from the Russian perspective. It would look like another life-and-death encirclement by toothless u.s. proxy, nato. And that "life-or-death" perception is what u.s. war planners are counting on to cause the russians to react first.

Maybe I'm mistaken though.

Maybe if the russians don't act first, the administration of the u.s, soon up to its eyeballs in a collapsing economy, and desperate for a distraction, takes it as a green light to overstep its bounds even further. Maybe the old order of u.s based internationalism sees this as moment that will decide between its hegemony in a unipolar world going forward for a little while longer (a few decades of "empty gas tank / running on fumes" diplomacy), or what finally ushers in the beginnings of a multipolar regime of competing powers.

I doubt there will be nukes. On account of the fact the u.s. military would get steamrolled in ukraine without them. It's why the u.s. is arming the separatists. You think biden, his circle of jewish warhawks and the shitshow running the pentagon wouldn't immediately show up, brass balls in tow, squaking for a real fight if they thought they could get away with it? Of course they would. 1. nothing to lose in terms of lives if they thought they could win 2. money to be made, if they thought they could win. And yet, here the u.s. is, arming separatists. Because the u.s. can't win in that theater, and thats not the intention anyway. The intention is to suck russia into a provocation that makes it look like russia is the aggressor. Thats pretty much the only way the u.s. will be able to justify rallying nato. The right move here is for russia to meet tit for tat and arm their own separatists. And also to fund u.s. journalists abroad to document u.s. backed insurgents and any war crimes those insurgents commit. This is still a war of perceptions on the international stage. Of course it wouldn't look like that from the Russian perspective. It would look like another life-and-death encirclement by toothless u.s. proxy, nato. And that "life-or-death" perception is what u.s. war planners are counting on to cause the russians to react first. Maybe I'm mistaken though. Maybe if the russians don't act first, the administration of the u.s, soon up to its eyeballs in a collapsing economy, and desperate for a distraction, takes it as a green light to overstep its bounds even further. Maybe the old order of u.s based internationalism sees this as moment that will decide between its hegemony in a unipolar world going forward for a little while longer (a few decades of "empty gas tank / running on fumes" diplomacy), or what finally ushers in the beginnings of a multipolar regime of competing powers.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (46).
[–] • 0 pt

From what I understand Odessa et al were and are traditionally russian territory. That said, thats an old playbook for war if ever I saw it.

I got to stop you on the "russia illegally" anything. Gotta be realistic here. There is no law when it comes to international survival and the u.s. has been trying to illegally encircle russia with "defensive" missile installations for years. A violation of the spirit of MAD if anything, but thats to be expected. The russians are certainly developing hypersonics. Well, everyone is, who can blame em?

No one is flexing on the Russian federation though because there will be consequences

There will certainly be consequences, consequences all around, some more than others. Nature of the world.

Russia plays this game as well. They pay off Islamic Chechen rebels to destabilise the area so they can lay pipe for oil

Fair enough.

Russia can rape resources from neighboring nations.

"rape"?

Hyperbole. If I wanted to be argumentative I'd accuse you of having an agenda or bias.

I'm not by any stretch of the imagination a great fan of russias subversions in my country (the u.s.). And yet even I can see theres been a push to "get russia" from an international coalition of sorts, for some time.

Maybe I don't know enough about the situation, of russia, or maybe I'm misinformed.

Enlighten me.

[–] • 0 pt

Jesus fucking christ. Imagine being the largest country in the world, 1/6 of all land mass, and still need more. All that hutzpah about protecting russians in ukraine is exactly that - chutzpah. They don't give a shit about their own countrymen, many people in remote regions live in it is 1910's, with no gas and light, cities except Moscow and SPB are depressing places where there are no opportunities, and constant migration of tajiks, azers, other scum from different -stans is never stopping. How that different from nigger invasions in the west? Exactly the same.

Russia is a jew worshipping shithole and you have got to be a blind retard not to know this. Putin is Bibi's best friend, antisemitism and Holohoax denial gets you prison sentence. Ethnic nationalism is outlawed as 'extremism' and there are no ethnic nationalists in Russia at all. The same goes with ukraine, another victim of the jews. Habad Lubavitch infested hell, a new Jerusalem, and the politics of both countries are pure circus, dedicated to killing off the best and bravest of both nations. Only a fool would pick a side in this theatrical 'conflict'. The jews think of eastern Ukraine as theirs, because it used to be parts of Khazaria. No Russian or Ukrainian gain anything from this 'war', only the jews.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

hey don't give a shit about their own countrymen,

Then why do they outlaw globohomo?

Because they "don't care."

What were you expecting rainbows and a welcoming committee for ex-pat russians?

1910's, with no gas and light, cities except Moscow and SPB are depressing places where there are no opportunities

They live in the frigid ass crack of the world, went through an internal dissolution, and were only industrialized by force over a couple of decades. What did you expect?

and constant migration of tajiks, azers, other scum from different -stans is never stopping.

Thats a bigger problem that I have no answer for.

Russia is a jew worshipping shithole and you have got to be a blind retard not to know this.

Or not a russian. Which I'm not. But if you are, tell me more.

Putin is Bibi's best friend

I think ever nation, if it doesn't want to turn into the next "hitler!" plays nice with israel, the worlds largest criminal syndicate.

antisemitism and Holohoax denial gets you prison sentence.

See my previous statement.

Ethnic nationalism is outlawed as 'extremism'

Tell me more if you know more.

' and there are no ethnic nationalists in Russia at all.

I highly doubt that, otherwise what need is there for laws outlawing ethnic nationalism?

Habad Lubavitch infested hell, a new Jerusalem, and the politics of both countries are pure circus,

Do a write up, or make a post going into detail. Many of us would appreciate it.

Only a fool would pick a side in this theatrical 'conflict'.

If russia loses, its the nail in the coffin for any factions in the u.s. that have even so much as a whiff of anti-israel sentiment/resistance. It would be the final move needed to cement the conflict as euro-sino, which is a much more controlled theater, compared to the u.s. hegemons vs russian gangsterism which looks like a defensive posture if ever I saw one.

The balance of power is maintained, thats one more day that victory for globalist judaism and international banks is forestalled.

[–] • 1 pt

I was born in Russia, in Vladivostok, moved to Ukraine because my parents divorced and my mother was from here. I don't really care about this conflict so I don't have any biases towards Ukraine and I see it for what it is. Jewish president, jewish prime minister, half of the parlament jews and other scum, doomed country and dumb people. Have you ever seen hasidic jews? The ones with hats? They belong to Habad. 'Russian gangsters' are in fact jewish and belong to that sect. People like Boris Berezovsky, Vadim Rabinovitch, Igor Kolomoyskiy and the like of them, Kushner too. They rule both countries and their HQ is in Dnipro city. What is there to write up? Habad is a radical orthodoxy, religious jews who believe their rabbi Scheerson, who, in fact, had written about putting two nations against one another, and are dead set on making Ukraine into Heavenly Jerusalem.

Google Russia's 282, the extremism law. They put people in jails for making racist statements online, similiar to Britcuckistan. Words like 'Fuck mudshit invaders' or posting a post with Hitler would doom you to sentence. Holocaust denial is outlawed, just like in jew infested Germany. Putin constantly blames evil nazis for everything and sucks up to jews, called polish ambassador 'anti-semitic pig', for example. I can write a lot, but it won't change your mind. There is this stupid perception of Russia as last bastion of the West which is laughable but still it is prevailing among westerners for some reason.