The victim is the man or woman who is indiscriminately targeted and stolen from. Stolen property, stolen dignity, stolen physical comfort, and above all else stolen life. If I am driving with no seat belt, and an officer says "all person's must wear a seat belt it's the lawr!" I become the victim after facing extortion or kidnapping.
Decent enough I guess but it sounds kind of iffy. I bring this up mainly because people are experts at twisting words and ideas around if they have motivation to do so.
What is or is not indiscriminate targeting is likely a thing subject to debate. Dignity and comfort are a matter of personal opinion. What is or is not theft can be debated as well. If one were to use them as standards there would be a lot to iron out. One would also need to ask what situations if any would exceptions be appropriate and why or why not.
(post is archived)