Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

533

I am a living man with God given rights. I am not a human (which means monster) I am not a person (which means property) I am not the corporation that was made with my same name on my date of birth (SSID/Birth certificate)

If the law states "all person's...blah blah" and I file an affidavit stating I'm a living man and not a person, if there is no victim I have committed no crime. It would ten be up to the prosecutor to prove I am, in fact, not a living man, and/or I have no God given rights.

I am a living man with God given rights. I am not a human (which means monster) I am not a person (which means property) I am not the corporation that was made with my same name on my date of birth (SSID/Birth certificate) If the law states "all person's...blah blah" and I file an affidavit stating I'm a living man and not a person, if there is no victim I have committed no crime. It would ten be up to the prosecutor to prove I am, in fact, not a living man, and/or I have no God given rights.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Words on paper, they don't necessarily have any bearing on repercussions because evidence can always be fabricated and/or planted for the desired guilty verdict, likewise a blind eye can always be turned when convenient. The main purpose is just something convenient to point to as a rule of thumb on what not to do and likely penalties. At the end of the day all that matters is who's in charge and what the desire of the moment is.

[–] • 1 pt

Laws keep me from killing morons who piss me off.

[–] • 0 pt

Laws? For me,my right index finger keeps me from murdering morons.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

You abide by your own morals rather than live in fear of consequences?

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, it's called 'common sense' something that is almost non-existent these days.

[–] • 0 pt

If there is a victim, there is a crime.

[–] • 0 pt

Can you with your own words define what a victim is in a non subjective way?

[–] • 0 pt

The victim is the man or woman who is indiscriminately targeted and stolen from. Stolen property, stolen dignity, stolen physical comfort, and above all else stolen life. If I am driving with no seat belt, and an officer says "all person's must wear a seat belt it's the lawr!" I become the victim after facing extortion or kidnapping.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Should breaking a commandment (God's law) be considered a crime? Namely the most important commandment; thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, thy mind and thy soul; since most of man's laws are derived directly from Gods commandments. Also, if you don't love God, should you be given the freedoms He so graciously bestows upon us?

[–] • 0 pt

Are we talking the original ten commandments for the hebrews? Or the 6 commandments spoken by jesus? So I know how to respond better

[–] • 0 pt

There is no difference. Jesus simply condensed the original 10 commandments given to Moses, into 2. See Matthew 22:37-40 for Jesus' summation of the commandments.

[–] • 0 pt

In my personal knowledge (nothing impressive) the only rule I know that is important to live by is to not steal. This is natural/moral law summed up into it's finest point "do not steal"

The rules laid for the hebrews thousands of years ago, the covenant made between God and moses for gods protection...it hard to imagine the all forgiving father, full of unconditional love, would condemn a good man for not reciprocating that passion. Seems like a waste of jesus self sacrifice in my opinion. Some priests molest children but claim to love God. Some good men protect children and never pray a day in their life.

[–] • 1 pt

philosophically law is applied power, you enforce your rules on a society, what you think does not matter, the police are enforcers for those with power, those with power make the rules, your opinion of it does not matter

[–] • 0 pt

This argument does hold up in court

[–] • 1 pt

we are not talking legally, it does not have to, we are talking philosophically here

but tell that to the Mexican cartels or the American government, both prove the point to be true, when America gets accused of war crimes they threaten to invade the court if they get investigated, lets see how the court holds up to a nuke lol

[–] • 0 pt

Do you read past the click bait?

[–] • 0 pt

when America gets accused of war crimes they threaten to invade the court if they get investigated,

I'm surprised the US doesn't just bend over and apologize for fighting a war too hard like a bunch of fags.

[–] • 1 pt

extortion at gunpoint?

[–] • 0 pt

It can be scary to face an opponent who owns a monopoly in violence.

[–] • 1 pt

but they are me. law enforcement is made up of people. they can be reasoned with.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Laws are like maps and guides for where consequences may lie in response to certain actions. Laws don't really exist, human behavior is governed by the following four considerations: "What do I desire?" "What do I fear?" "What can I do?" "What will likely happen when I do X?" Laws are their consequences, nothing more or less, when the consequences are removed, the laws may as well not exist. Where the consequences exist for only certain parties, all other parties will use them to oppress those to whom they apply, while at the same time breaking them with impunity.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

They got their guys with guns, they make the rules. If you're a chicken shit or you get put down then you'll have to abide by their rules. So it was in medieval Spain, so it is today.

The reason that everything seems so complicated for modern man is because he makes it complicated, to hide the fact that he's a chicken shit. To make it seem like there's some kind of awesome moral/legal dilemma that only he faces, when it's the same dilemma every group of men in history has faced, that the founding fathers faced.

The solution is exactly the same today as well. Get tougher, braver. That's it. The difference is that medieval man understood that that's what he needed to do, even if he couldn't do it.

The founding fathers were able to prevail because they were strong and brave but many of them died, their families too. They paid that price for us but we didn't and now flat out refuse.

This is not the way it works, gentlemen. You ought to be thankful that they even left you a fighting chance. You'll be really sorry when it completely passes because you and your loved ones will simply be dispatched by the enemy.

Obviously, they will be having sex with your wives and daughters, etc. before that happens and possibly after.

[–] • 0 pt

You should aspire to become a martyr. regardless of how insane they claim you are; some will be inspired to become you. ghandi set the example. I won't try to goad you, I will strive to enlighten you. go out in a blaze of gunfire if you choose, but harm no innocents. only take the evil with you. I prefer a peaceful solution. but peace is beyond their comprehension. I'm talking shit and I hope you ignore me, sounds good in my head but this ain't about me. be wise. a lot of them will goad you into fighting for their rights. walk away.

[–] • 0 pt

Laws are a creation by a society that seek conformity. You do this , we promise you won't be harmed. Until Niggers got privilege, those assumptions were generally honored. When Democrats started using Niggers as useful idiots; they allowed Niggers to not be held accountable. Laws for thee but not for me. If you find it necessary to kill to defend yourself or your family from a Nigger, you do so and know the law is on your side and corruption deprived you of your rights. laws are good, corruption is evil . they may not admit being corrupt. but admission is not necessary.

[–] • 0 pt

A law is an immutable force that all things living and inanimate must abide by, or face some form of consequences. A law does not change when crossing an imaginary line. There has been hundreds of years of putting words infront of definitions to trick us goys into thinking some rules and penal codes are more serious. Different words carry different psychological weights. Saying law, rather than rule, makes people perceive reality different. Allowing ((them)) to implement a more serious punishment. Some goys believe we deserve it. This is the true dark magic of semantics

[–] • 0 pt

A law is an agreement. Just like it's basis; the constitution. Every state agreed to be a part of a union with no backing out once admitted. they agreed to follow the representation of the several states. Weak representatives allowed it to be hacked (with their every life is valuable bullshit). and allowed communist to gain power. a bloody war is how it will end. Democrats opine Mexicans will help them fight that war when they wouldn't stand up for their own homeland. they talk a good line but it won't play out. Old timers won't save you. when they get your guns, you are the new Niggers.

[–] • 1 pt

So a law is the same as a contract?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yes, it is. And our government has broken its side of the agreement, therefore we are not beholden to our end of the deal.

It is in these exact circumstances that we are intended to overthrow the government by force and renew the contract.

We do this by chasing out the representatives of the government, most immediately the police, and establishing new governments in the places we Clear them out of.

Antifa had the right idea, the founders would be in full agreement with the idea of establishing autonomous zones and expanding them to push out the old government, they'd also be in favor of using the new government to punish the representatives of the old government that descended into tyranny.

Of course this is all down to the philosophy of the American founders.

[–] • 0 pt

the declaration instructs us not to overthrow our government for transient reasons, but I think we have devolved well above transient reasons. when chicks think they got dicks and it gives them special rights, we are well beyond what our founders considered transient reasons. When Niggers think that racism against their emancipators is righteous , they need to learn who really gave them the freedom to escape slavery. Republicans will never stand up for them again. let them die in chains. there is a reason that planned parenthood has reduced their population from 35% to 13% . it wasn't because they wanted less mouths to feed, it was because less Niggers meant easier to control. what generally happens: some rich cats move in a pay the rebels off and they become docile and compliant ( occupy movement). human nature is a bitch when you can't goad someone into fighting your battle for you. (ideas from the crypt).

[–] • 0 pt

the constitution is an agreement, the law is derived from the agreement of the constitution , so yes , laws are an agreement in our society. you break the agreement, you are punished accordingly. Unless you ar a Nigger, and you get a pass because you are a useful idiot and will vote for your enslavement into eternity. Without the agreement; America is a piece of land subjected to the rules of survival of the fittest where there are no laws concerning killing who you deem is to your detriment. I always like to imagine human rights like I'm a human out on the savanna in Africa. what rights do the critters afford me on the savanna . the only right as a human is to be eaten or defend myself. In a society, we consider rights as a human right. there is no such thing. it's a ruse. itis societal rights. when the society breaks down, it's kill or die. the niceties are gone. congress holds n power over you except what is afforded by the constitution , if they destroy the agreement, you are free to set your own rules. 330 million against a couple hundred thousand isn't good odds. will the military fire upon their own kinsman? a few will but most won't. they take an oath to protect against enemies foreign and domestic. Democrats are the domestic enemy. they wilfully disobey the constitution they swore to uphold. it's an easy battle. some of us will die, but the rest will regain their freedom from tyrants. The fence and the razor wire above the fence was a mind fuck. they know 330 million will destroy them. it was a psyop. afew strategically placed mortars and the whole building was history. Old people on their way out , playing by 1940 rules. too old and damaged to undersatnd the intellect of the modern world. Zuckerberg thinks he wrote(stole) the code for facebook, when in fact, it was developed over the last 100 years by people a lot smarter than him. he assembel the stolen idea that was generously shared for the betterment of humanity. I tell my children, ever discover something awesome, keep it to yourself. you will regret sharing it. someone will figure out how to make a cage out of it. zuck is a thief (proven) and is using his theft to control descent. never share your enlightenment's. (gifts). the constitution isn't an enlightenment, it's your rights and the government doesn't give them to you.

Load more (1 reply)