With genetics my point is compounding returns: economic, civil, and scientific and disappearing deficits: economic and social, make imposed engineering too vital to pass up but too invasive not to cause rebound, so a happy medium reinforced with propaganda and the sort of patience an outside observer not bound by the human lifespan. We have to make this stick and work. Going slow on purpose is also useful because we could learn that we are dangerously limiting our gene pool and give ourselves the resources to correct the problem by not having hard committed to doing this in one generation. The alternative are likely genetic erasure and certain slide back down the bell curve, without this we encounter the great filter. I'm gonna keep harping on the automation and I'll give you a core notion to my thinking. The horse population in the USA before and after the model T had been on the market for 10 years. In just 10 years 98% of horses were gone, machines that did their complex functions, and in manny cases did them worse were easier to maintain, fix, and less complex in their utilisation, ultimately convenience was a factor. we had to invest in complex infrastructure, and in the case of these machines yes more jobs were created but compare useless humans with useless horses. The number 1 job for women is "healthcare professional" for men it is truck driver/tractor operator, if you included other heavy equipment operators this is an even bigger percentage but just those 2 are practically completely automatable this represents something like a quarter or fifth of male employment. What is a 45 year old trucker going to do? He might be able to get a job in his company's mechanic pool or see if he can snag a job in the same field that requires a human touch like propane delivery or parcel delivery but the job pool is getting clogged, a massive labor surplus now exists, his guy can only be retrained so much and it's not worth a big investment to train this guy for at most 15 more years of work when you could train a 20 year old and get 40 out of him. I'm underselling Mr. 45 a bit I know but you can see it doesn't take 1 mechanic per truck even if you need to onboard software and computer techs for a fleet you have likely halved your total employees in 3 to 5 years at about all of the companies that can. Even if truck robberies become an issue highway security companies can defend multiple corporate contracts at one time with just one or two guys in a patrol vehicle. At best, contractors and all, big rig transport industry is going to downsize by 25%. Tractors for farming might downsize but I'm betting automation leads to specialization that encourages further automation or contract work going up but farmers hate contracting maintenance and repairs it could result in independent farmers being priced out of the economy and a dystopic nightmare where tech companies control the majority of our food supply, hell, soil farming could go the way of the dinosaur in a number of crops, hydroponics are far easier to automate and you can use it for raising fish on a large scale, all in doors. I've recently seen a gigantic vertical hydroponic crop belt, imagine a long oval chain constantly moving the plants in large aeroponic planters up toward the roof and back down into resting water below the nutrition suspension the resting water is absorbed when plants come down then fish can nibble and clean any unwanted growth off exposed roots, plants go back up and this all simulates a day night cycle and during the day natural sunlight reduces electricity costs and charges batteries via solar to run at night no need for pesticides or large tractors and because its hydroponic/aeroponic plants grow faster and they can be grown out of season, the only reason this isn't how all farming is done is because economies of scale are slow to develop due to high initial investment and conventional agriculture industry, pesticides, farm equipment, stands to loose out on big money. Apparently vertical rice patties are also looking like they are the future too. We can always handle more food I think so I'm not so sure the total workers will shrink in this example but the yields will go up and workers will need to be retrained, downsizing is the favorite tactic of US business so I could see problems like Mr.45 all over again. The next issue in this retraining problem can go back to horses, horses stopped being the best option for transportation in most environments and also stopped being the best choice for certain manual labor jobs as a result most got sold to become dogfood/glue and because so many horses hit the market many became affordable as farm equipment and transportation again for a short time but there was no market for new horses outside of ranches and race tracks and they did their best to breed their own horses, most horses were never up to becoming race horses or ranch horses most were just meant to pull carts to and from town or go visit the neighbors or family on for a day trip. Those meat and glue horses couldn't be retrained to do another job because they lacked needed ability. Here comes the big IQ tie in: https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=187&v=5-Ur71ZnNVk&feature=emb_title I don't like jordan peterson but he does a good job explaining this succinctly, there's a longer video of this discussion about 20 minutes long, it gives more detail and citations. At a certain point menial jobs like fast food worker or shelf stocker will vanish or downsize by 80% or more as robots can do them and those menial workers will often be perpetually unemployable. If incompetence lies below 83 IQ then as the needed intellectual prowess goes up due to menial labour evaporating so too will that line of competence So what you should be asking yourself is: Why didn't those horses just learn to repair automobiles? Niggers, low motivation, and low IQ people aren't going to have room in the post automation economy, this economically disaffected block will say as much as you have about the purpose of technology and say it's not fair that they shouldn't benefit from the match of technology. Their solution will be a basic income for all and it will have a majority support as nearly a third lose their jobs, maybe half could find new work but most new work in the post automation landscape will be in healthcare or require a high proficiency with computers, and creativity. So you have something like 20% or more of the population becoming unemployable this decade we will have a perpetual 25% plus unemployment rate and the consequences of basic income will either make or break the family unit. On one hand marrying and receiving UBI means you are taken care of and don't need other roommates, on the other hand as a woman you could just shack up with your best girlfriend and keep being a slut until you both get so old and haggard you share one dog to save on food. I think women will be lost but girls will see an obvious way of life. You see my family home life reform concept feeds into this, with jobs getting scarce we could in theory solve most of the problems by removing a huge block of the existing labor force because as the labor surplus disappears wages must become more competitive. In my new intergenerational family women are far more likely to stay in the home and become home makers who dabble in a small business or craft they can monetize at will custom fashion, home decor, or other hand made goods will go up in value allowing women to have an at will side gig as a hobby, in a single acre a family matriarch and her daughters in law could operate a number of business, a few robots in the basement sweatshop pumping out 80%+ of the work for various garments a partially automated aeroponic greenhouse, some chickens and even a goat or cow, make enough money and you can get a robotic cooking wall, this is a touch of light futurism but these things all exist today, the question is whether they could become affordable soon. Dishwashers, washing and drying machines all enabled feminism but robotic cooking walls installed over compatible cooking and preparation surfaces, folding machines, robot vacuums, and economic viability from the home would call many women back, ot at least feminist warcrys lose their meaning, the woman's work becomes just having and raising children and dusting, yeah its sedentary but with our postal services, internet and advanced technology a home business that allows you to work as you like will be easier than ever, this means much of the feminists gripes over traditional marriages are no longer viable, being a house servant who can't afford to escape servitude can't be a complaint, "barefoot, pregnant, and chained in the kitchen" wont make sense to the next generation of girls who see mom working in the home and earning money to buy new designer pregnancy shoes and to pay for multiple family vacations per year. As a part of my education reforms sumer break would be shortened and winter break lengthened. Stir crazy mothers have something to motivate their side-hustles. Over this decade automation will only be limited by wheels, the dexterity of actuators, and a human sensibility where needed. I can give an edge example: teachers they can assign work, grade it, check for errors and identify them, and even adequately grade essays and book reports, teachers skim them but an AI can evaluate presence of subject matter, correct use of language, and plagiarism. One teacher then could handle many more students as an AI teacher can do most of the job of a regular teacher while keeping a full documentation on each student for a human teacher to review. This would depend on the subject and discipline level of students obviously. For every 4-5 service, manufacturing, and transportation job lost I figure 1 new maintenance/engineer/technician position would open up. for every 10 such jobs lost I'd bet a security job would open up and a staff/management position would disappear. I think 40% of the theoretical workforce will be unemployed in 2034 and if we don't stop jews/dems basic income, which will be necessary to live, will only be delivered to good goys who have high enough social credit scores and don't blaspheme against the new state religion of holocaust worship, white people bad, diversity good, and whatever ideas chinks demand we worship. As to that last paragraph of yours I think our great filter is probably spiteful mutants if the rise and fall of civilizations recorded in history is any indication, further I think simulation theory is probably correct, holographic theory was disproven but that's not saying much, its likely we have a creator and that our simulation just may not have the processing power for alien life or the great filter is more complex than we think, it could be mitochondrial organelles make the difference between complex life and everything else and that there are manny quite specific filters before that one, M class, oxygen nitrogen atmosphere, 70% water, gravity within minor deviation of 9.8m/s squared, could be all the other intelligent life is stuck on planets they can't escape because of higher gravity, most earth like planets are larger by a fair bit and we know no rocket could escape a planet just ~20% more massive. I apologize if some of this doesn't jive too well, I've typed it out during a couple of breaks; you might see my conundrum though, with a mix of predictions and pursuits all so interconnected where does one start in writing a coherent manifesto? Frankly I'm tempted to transcend the manifesto as a medium and make a digital museum piece of sorts, something like that assatru theological guide that sperg u/theoldones was making. As much as I've written there are still things like deurbanization and "sub-rural" living I haven't touched on and then there is the problem of strategy, telling people how to stop our enemies and begin our revitalization would likely be like farting into the wind except the wind has eyes and ears and finds my ass gas to be too potent for me to go free.