Tarrant's masacre always looked legit to me but I saw a video that shows the magazine he picks up after being tackled was already on the floor when he first entered the building. It could be a really consistent video artifact, i have an original video if the attack I saved the day of and have been avoiding checking it, I really should though...
I've never committed an action as these men have nor do I encourage it but some of my writings may have inspired at least one such incident, be it a false flag or not, the crusius Wal-Mart shooting, about a quarter to a third of that manifesto is directly plagiarized from my writings about automation worker displacement and a couple of other predictions.
I haven't penned a formal and ordered manifesto but if you want to skim the short hand schizo post versions I've written for poal comments dredge through my comments.
The jist if it is remove jews, set up ethnocentric migration and begin sending non citizens nonwhites home, offer nogs reparations if they give up citizenship and move to africa, outlaw islam, judaism and attempt to reform christianity or start a new reformed sect to be more masculine. Segregate schools by sex and race, various other school reforms allowing white students to graduate work ready with the equivalent of a 4 year degree and apprenticeship by 20 with an A and B plan and years of experience, enforce adultery laws, make producing pornography for distribution a crime though not distribution itself or possession, expand privacy laws, defeating pornography as concept will never happen but making it an industry you can't succeed in should solve most of the problems, willing to revise these measures to catch blackmarket pornographers or wage propaganda warfare. Home and family life reforms designed to have women married. Early and done reproducing before 28 the goal is that evwn if a woman wanted 8 kids she could do it by that age with a 9 month break between each pregnancy if she started at 16 and was there for married before that. By 38 the woman's youngest would be 10 and she could get a solid 22 years working professionally without much worry over her children. The primary focus of my writings is a stable and sustainable societal foundation that resists corruption and decay which penetrates all civilizations. Tax automation out the ass to pay down debt pay for healthcare, end all entitlement programs and just do a basic income, without massive administrative complexes the costs for healthcare and government entitlements go down. I go into more details and maths occasionally but the figures work and the debt does get paid down so long as we push nigs out. The last leg of my writings focuses on genetic engineering, consequences, pitfalls and its necessity and uses. Essentially if we control enough share of global media we can make the world white using genetic engineering and we solve our remaining hispanic, middle eastern, and indian problems in the west by forcing them to engineer their children to be white for national unity and greater achievement we could leave the great majority if their children's genes alone just take their caucasian ancestors genes to the top of the expression remove non white genes in competition with white genes and voila you've got spanish and portuguese looking spics, middle easterners that look like the whites living in the region thousands of years ago and the south european slaves their ancestors raped, and indians that look like the fair skinned caucasian indians that were once much more common in north india. The next generation will be allowed to engineer their children to be whiter and have the best genes on offer, we make whiteness package deal internationally, if you want white features you must take white neurogenetics too and so as japan and korea start making anime girls reality they also end up with white minds. The highest peaks of human intellect are exclusively white and so to receive them the child must be engineered white.
I skimmed it all like I said but I give basis and method in my long form writings.
Is the large paragraph yours of copy/pasta from the manifesto?
Largely, that large paragraph is correct. Everyone know it. It's knowledge built into our dna. I only disagree on the following:
1) Tax automation - there is a bit of naiivate about technolgy and economics built into that statement. There are more sophisticated and more accurate ways to deal with technology.
2) Forcing genetic engineering on others - okay I get what you are saying, which is principally that a lot of the worlds non whites have white roots and are the end result of our ancestors being outbred. The problem is the amount of energy required to do this makes it entirely impractical. It is far more likely that we will end up in genocidal wars than anything to happen at scale in this category.
I would say that if you look at the white nations: AU / NZ / AMERICA / CANADA / EUROPE / RUSSIA, you will notice a few things:
3) Our lands are basically empty. China and India are full in comparison.
4) If we were to just increase the birthrate to 5 or 6 kids per couple, the white population doubles in 20 years. It doubles again in another 20 or so. This strategy alone is the single greatest opportunity for our people. If we can keep on expanding our populations to completely fill our lands, the rest of the world does not stand a chance.
5) In order to accomplish expansionist goals we cannot engage in any activity that stagnates economic and technological development. You need to feed people, a lot of the climates are harsh and yet need to be filled. We will need economics and technologies at scales that we have not imaged even currently.
I mention the latter part to point out that our side is missing a few really big things: paralysis through overanalysis ... most of the things i read lean on overengineering and over planning. As such, we are missing some really big opportunities for how to resolve the issues of foreigners in our lands. The other big one is that we are very individualistic and perhaps even have a tendency towards shyness as a genetic group. We need to form local groups of men dedicated to building on the fundamentals of engineering and financial know how to move our people forward.
Otherwise the big paragraph is dead on.
This was just a shorthand for a lot of my ideas, painfully succinct.
Issue one you had was automation taxes, the whole world is going to end up doing this ti support basic income and education programs for workers and the robotics revolution alongside the AI office worker are going to force a billion people out of employment, trucks and trains are being automated now, some terrain wont allow current automation tech but this is a process that will win out. Anything done with just eyes and hands in an assembly line will be done more cheaply by machine, anything that is just data input or analysis will be downsized dramatically, the limiting factors are legs and balance in the physical automation and in digital automation the only real barrier in digital automation is human sensibilities but that can be anything fron letting a nigger keep doing data entry because firing POCs is racis or needing a human touch for designing software.
Countries that fail to retain means of production when the automation revolution is in full swing are going to have a horrible time and maybe even fall apart if you don't have automation to tax and are just letting your people buy foreign robot made junk your expenses become another's basic income, essentially your economy is one big slush fund for the other countries to educate and develop their populations.
As a final note my policy on taxing automation is that we should not tax home businesses or very small businesses, under 5 robots, 1 or 2 pieces of automated software, probably would require a grading system to prevent companies from cheating.
As to genetic engineering I think it the cheaper solution, we need to get the cost on it down to below 4 grand per baby if possible and use mass media to keep western beauty and culture envied and desirable. Spics are a net drain of $450k on the Treasury over a lifetime on average adding about 10k to that to dramatically reverse that average is just wise, basically everybody but whites and east asians are tax burdens, I said force but we would use creative propaganda, and incentives to make the first generation happen, those who resist would be forced to comply through a slow process of soft power, essentially we use rhetoric, coercion, and shame over decades.
The family and education reform system is designed to encourage stable young marriages and obviously we would offer only white families an incentive to reproduce through financial aid, this combined with intergenerational housing means a man of 26 could have an apartment in his family home he pays only upkeep on and 2.5 children with enough in the bank to buy his own home, his wife just graduated at 21(a year worth of pregnancy delays) and she has been working in his mother's home business part time since they married 5 years ago, his older brother is going to inherit the family home so he needs to buy a house before baby #3 over crowds their apartment in the family home. 6 years of professional work, the wife's part time work covers basic expenses, no rent and the work study program in school required to pay a wage was nearly enough to pay off the apartment expansion loan on his family's home, this guy should be able to afford a 250K property with no loan. It seems too perfect but the point is making concessions in a few places to make this possible in our modern world. That's a snapshot of reforming family and home life and should demonstrate why education reform is vital to it. In this scenario replacement rate is well beyond guaranteed we only need control over our government and media ince again which means pushing jews out, if we can push jews out we can reclaim the future they stole from us with relative ease. And further we can start practising this intergenerational home life today and as our enemies legalize lowering the age of consent we can turn that attempt at poisoning the youth into a positive result.
I skipped over a key reason for much of the above, obviously broken homes have broken our country and our race but we have data on divorce we know virginity is the single most important factor in successful marriages and that today the average girl loses her virginity at just 13 and this has been on a downward trend for decades it was 17 my mother's generation and boomer started the divorce craze, that's because average age of first marriage was 21 and rising at that time, today average age of first marriage is 29 and pushing 30 boomers had a divorce rate over 30% from just 3 years on average of sluting around, zoomers are looking at 17 years of whoring around on average, at that point why even marry? most of these white nigger bitches will have had an army of mixed race turds fall out of them by 30 anyhow. Just one premarital partner makes a girl 48% likely to have a divorce if she marries, each subsequent partner adds 2-6%, the average woman 10 years ago reported having between 6 and 8 partners before settling down. Marrying girls early is about stopping gynocentric collapse syndrome where it starts and molding girls to be wives and mothers again.
https://gvid.tv/v/BgjEHX I only just found this video but this guy identifies a number of problems my solutions would resolve even if only long enough to forestall our natural decline to reach genetic engineering.
Thanks for the follow up. Looks like I need to do more reading of your material.
In short:
1) Genetics - I see the point you are making I disagree on the economic viability. But, I will entertain the notion.
2) Technology taxation - I am not certain you fully grasp technology, how network effects work and how it all relates to human development. I would be happy to put $20 on any of your technology predictions being wrong. They will be wrong for the following reasons:
Human activity is elastic.
Technological development is elastic.
Technological development isn't a smooth line. There are all kinds of starts, stops, redirects and so on. Changes sometimes come quickly, other times take forever. There is no guarantee technological change will continue.
Let's take physics for example. First 100 years of physics, tons of innovation, we get nukes, nuclear power generation and put men on the moon because those were all low hanging fruit. What has happened in the last 40 years in physics? Nothing. Nothing at all has happened in physics at all, there has been ZERO progress. No one know if this is a misallocation of resources or if all the low hanging fruit has been picked and the distance to the next set of breakthroughs is so large that the human mind cannot cross it.
- Economics is elastic.
There is zero chance any of your economic predictions even get close to being true.
You do realize that technological development ISN'T without reason or a goal? You do realize that the goal of technology is to develop a race of slaves to do the work that we don't want to?
Marshall Mcluhan, if i remember correctly, said something like "hunanity is the bilogical reproductive system of machines". Well, that is one way to put it, for sure. The other way to say the same thing is that what we all want is a race of slaves that will do all of our hard work. All of the worlds great civilizations were built on slavery of one sort or another.
All that is happening is that machines are doing more and more work for us. As we manage to offload labour to machines, economics will simply change what is scarce and what is not and the price we charge for exchanging the new things of value will change and we will just do that.
You can also say the same thing another way: if humans are the reproductive organs for machines, and we are building a race of machine slaves, then we can also observe that as hunans offload more and more labour on to machines we onboard more and more human friendly computation. That is to say, for every labour job our robot slaves take over we replace with a new job that requires more and more human friendly computation.
Jobs going away won't ever be a problem. What will be a problem is if we manage to make a general purpose ai. We are seriously fucked if that ever happens. However, because the universe is not swarming with intelligent machines suggests that either we are the first to get close to the idea or there is something about the univers that prevents it from becoming plausible.
Otherwise, I think we agree on most stuff. I will have to dig into your posts more.
Thank you.
(post is archived)