Subversive Messages Of The Week: Not all jews are like harvey weinstein!

450

• (edited )

Alternatively:

Not all jews are like joseph rosenbaum and his attempt to murder a teenager for stopping an arson!

Not all jews are like jeff bezos!

Not all jews are anti-gun!

Not all jews hate america!

Not all jews are like zuckerberg!

Not all jews are like ted cruz!

Not all jews are like george soros!

Not all jew are like andrew cuomo!

Not all jews are like the head of the federal reserve!

Not all jews are like biden's health secretary!

"Defend individualism in america!"

This works because the implication is that some of them are like this. And you get to rightly say you're not criticizing all of them. You'll still be threatened with the label of "antisemite" and "nazi", and all the harassment and violence that brings against those who are labelled with it, but the most important thing is this: the 10-20% of the easily influenced public will believe when you tell them that it makes no sense to call everyone who criticizes individuals, as being racist against a whole group.'

The public is capable of seeing hypocrisy, is capable of seeing nonsense, and is capable of recognizing a bad faith argument ("muh nazis/antisemites!") used to suppress political dissent. Its just that the public is reactive and by default doesn't resort to these mental skills, and so the labels usually stick unless you have an easily understood and clear cut counter to the label.

Individualism is that.

The banks, and israelis who control american media and american politics understand this. They understand if one stands up, if one person among them is allowed to be criticized, then soon they'll all be on the radar, it'd open the floodgates. And so we must push "individualism". If they had not so readily defended their own. If they condemned the worst among them, rather than defend their every heinous act, their every fraud, their every crime, then it wouldn't have come to this. If they had not sought to suppress with force of government, every avenue of dissent, every attempt to criticize them, it would not have come to this tactic. But here we are, and no we must formulate a strategy that can work in the new stasi america, against the very people who as a collective, are destroying america. Focus on individualism, focus on it hard. This pulls double duty, because normally when a nation begins the long slow slide to asserting its sovereignty against foreign interlopers and social manipulators, the default is to call out the group. But this method has failed in the last sixty years because of new, scientifically refined methods of suppression, institutional police (the american KGB), and other methods, so a new angle is required. We assert, like the french, our right to criticize and have an opinion on anything and any one.

Call it the "american critical movement", or "american discourse movement" or "the american dissident movement". or the "american subversive movement", call it what you like.

This also works because it makes it hard, based on the name to divide us on identity. We champion open and public debate, a sort of "devil's advocate position", while controlling the sliding window by being aggressive about the bounds of "acceptable discourse". This changes the public sentiment driven by the left, from "some things are outside the bounds of acceptable speech", to an open question, which forces them to fight/argue on our terms over their very premise. It is strategically, tactically, politically, socially, and rhetorically a form of offense instead of the defeat by inches inherent in conservative defense.

This is because the public doesn't accept the theory of "dog whistles", never has, and never will. I've seen it. I've watched it unfold. They've been trying for more than 30 years to get the public to have a widespread belief in "dogwhistling" to the sound of crickets, accept for the tiny minority on the left. And even the left which I've talked to, most of them themselves don't understand or believe in dogwhistles. They just don't. They don't really consider it. They don't really think about it. The closest they get to it, is reflexive virtue signalling, itself prompted by media dogwhistles. As always, the enemy accuses others of what they do.

So subversion works to break this dutycycle down, this psychological springtrap breaks when you use subversive messaging because bolshevik mass-signalling relies on diffusion of responsibility leading to fewer and fewer people speaking out whenever the reactive-suppression mechanisms they've built kick-in and attack someone (i.e. mindless NPC virtue-signalling/dogwhistling attacks on the right based entirely on mere individual keywords that media like reddit algorithms and colbert and his ilk, have designed the public sentiment to target and respond to). In some senses, each time they do this to people, they "soften" resistant elements to "go along to get along", until each person is also responding like an NPC, a sort of literal political cancer.

And so by exposing them to subversive messages, what we are doing is making them more immune to the spread of these ideas, increasing the likelihood they spontaneously reject bolshevik talking points and ideology. And this is important because the jewish spirit of revolution (defiance, civil disobedience, social decay, like a cultural form of 'acid', eating away at civilizations), undergirds the driving power of bolshevik and social ideology. And how do you prevent that ideology from destroying people and nations? You isolate the message. And how do you do that? You isolate the messengers, one messenger at a time.

Remember: American Individualism, criticize the individual, claim the rhetorical and ideological ground they would otherwise retreat to when we start criticizing the group. Cut off the political 'retreat'. Once that picks up momentum, they'll panic, I guarantee it, and clamp down hard, circling the wagons and making their attitude and who they are apparent to all: NOT american at all, but a hostile and alien nation-within-a-nation that NEVER has and NEVER WILL consider itself american, but has in secret and in privately held group attitudes, always from the beginning considered itself separate, unique, and special, enough to place itself above all the rest of us, and whos publically-denied and private widespread belief in their own people's supremacy, *jewish *supremacy, grants them immunity to law, standards of acceptable social behavior, and the right to lie, cheat, steal, exploit, murder, spy for foreign nations, subvert, and destroy the citizens of any nation that welcomes them in.

We, like white blood cells, will at first mark the individual foreign element, the individual virus, mark it for destructive criticism (as they have done to us, our people, our way of life, traditions, and nation), and once sufficient people have started to criticize them, the infection is traced and becomes obvious at its source: the pus filled rotten gangrenous flesh wound that is babylon and its new age laws: the talmud, like the infected splinter in god's eye, or the dirty nails through jesus's hands, the foreign element lodged in society, blinding us as we die of its poison. And once that is identified, once they circle their wagons, the shapeshifters become blindly apparent for what they are: the infected splinter killing america.

And the solution to a splinter:

GRAB IT BY ITS BASE and

Yank.

It.

Out.

Only then can america be disinfected, the wound cleaned, and mended, once the source of the infection is gone.

And we will be the surgeons to do it. Criticism based on individualism works.

Alternatively: Not all jews are like joseph rosenbaum and his attempt to murder a teenager for stopping an arson! Not all jews are like jeff bezos! Not all jews are anti-gun! Not all jews hate america! Not all jews are like zuckerberg! Not all jews are like ted cruz! Not all jews are like george soros! Not all jew are like andrew cuomo! Not all jews are like the head of the federal reserve! Not all jews are like biden's health secretary! "Defend individualism in america!" This works because the implication is that some of them *are* like this. And you get to rightly say you're not criticizing all of them. You'll still be threatened with the label of "antisemite" and "nazi", and all the harassment and violence that brings against those who are labelled with it, but the most important thing is this: the 10-20% of the easily influenced public will believe when you tell them that *it makes no sense to call everyone who criticizes individuals, as being racist against a whole group.*' The public is capable of seeing hypocrisy, is capable of seeing nonsense, and is capable of recognizing a bad faith argument ("muh nazis/antisemites!") used to suppress political dissent. Its just that the public is *reactive* and by default doesn't resort to these mental skills, and so the labels *usually* stick unless you have an easily understood and clear cut counter to the label. **Individualism** is that. The banks, and israelis who control american media and american politics understand this. They understand if one stands up, if one person among them is allowed to be criticized, then soon they'll all be on the radar, it'd open the floodgates. And so we must push "individualism". If they had not so readily defended their own. If they condemned the worst among them, rather than defend their every heinous act, their every fraud, their every crime, then it wouldn't have come to this. If they had not sought to suppress with force of government, every avenue of dissent, every attempt to criticize them, it would not have come to this tactic. But here we are, and no we must formulate a strategy that can work in the new stasi america, against the very people who as a collective, are destroying america. Focus on individualism, focus on it hard. This pulls double duty, because normally when a nation begins the long slow slide to asserting its sovereignty against foreign interlopers and social manipulators, the default is to call out the group. But this method has failed in the last sixty years because of new, scientifically refined methods of suppression, institutional police (the american KGB), and other methods, so a new angle is required. We assert, like the french, our right to *criticize* and have an opinion on *anything and any one*. Call it the "american critical movement", or "american discourse movement" or "the american dissident movement". or the "american subversive movement", call it what you like. This also works because it makes it hard, based on the name to divide us on identity. We champion open and public debate, a sort of "devil's advocate position", while controlling the sliding window by being aggressive about the bounds of "acceptable discourse". This changes the public sentiment driven by the left, from "some things are outside the bounds of acceptable speech", to an open question, which forces them to fight/argue on *our terms* over **their very premise**. It is strategically, tactically, politically, socially, and rhetorically a form of **offense** instead of the **defeat by inches** inherent in conservative defense. This is because the public doesn't accept the theory of "dog whistles", never has, and never will. I've seen it. I've watched it unfold. They've been trying for more than 30 years to get the public to have a widespread belief in "dogwhistling" to the sound of crickets, accept for the tiny minority on the left. And even the left which I've talked to, most of them themselves don't understand or believe in dogwhistles. They just don't. They don't really consider it. They don't really think about it. The closest they get to it, is reflexive virtue signalling, itself prompted by **media dogwhistles**. As always, the enemy accuses others of what they do. So subversion works to break this dutycycle down, this psychological springtrap breaks when you use subversive messaging because bolshevik mass-signalling relies on diffusion of responsibility leading to fewer and fewer people speaking out whenever the reactive-suppression mechanisms they've built kick-in and attack someone (i.e. mindless NPC virtue-signalling/dogwhistling attacks on the right based **entirely** on mere individual **keywords** that media like reddit algorithms and colbert and his ilk, have designed the public sentiment to target and respond to). In some senses, each time they do this to people, they "soften" resistant elements to "go along to get along", until each person is *also* responding like an NPC, a sort of literal political cancer. And so by exposing them to subversive messages, what we are doing is making them more immune to the spread of these ideas, increasing the likelihood they spontaneously reject bolshevik talking points and ideology. And this is important because the *jewish spirit of revolution* (defiance, civil disobedience, social decay, like a cultural form of 'acid', eating away at civilizations), undergirds the driving power of bolshevik and social ideology. And how do you prevent that ideology from destroying people and nations? You isolate the message. And how do you do that? You isolate the *messengers*, *one messenger at a time*. Remember: American Individualism, criticize the *individual*, claim the rhetorical and ideological ground they would otherwise retreat to when we start criticizing the group. Cut off the political 'retreat'. Once that picks up momentum, they'll panic, I guarantee it, and clamp down hard, circling the wagons and making their attitude and who they are **apparent to all**: NOT american at all, but a *hostile and alien* nation-within-a-nation that NEVER has and NEVER WILL consider itself american, but has in secret and in privately held group attitudes, **always** from the beginning considered itself separate, unique, and special, enough to place itself above all the rest of us, and whos publically-denied and private widespread belief in **their own people's supremacy**, *jewish *supremacy, grants them immunity to law, standards of acceptable social behavior, and the right to lie, cheat, steal, exploit, murder, spy for foreign nations, subvert, and destroy the citizens of any nation that welcomes them in. We, like white blood cells, will at first mark the individual foreign element, the individual virus, mark it for destructive criticism (as they have done to us, our people, our way of life, traditions, and nation), and once sufficient people have started to criticize them, the infection is traced and becomes obvious at its source: the pus filled rotten gangrenous flesh wound that is babylon and its new age laws: the talmud, like the infected splinter in god's eye, or the dirty nails through jesus's hands, the foreign element lodged in society, blinding us as we die of its poison. And once that is identified, once they circle their wagons, the shapeshifters become **blindly apparent** for what they are: the infected splinter killing america. And the solution to a splinter: GRAB IT BY ITS BASE and Yank. It. Out. Only then can america be disinfected, the wound cleaned, and mended, once the source of the infection is gone. And we will be the surgeons to do it. Criticism based on individualism works.

(post is archived)