Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

Because socialism means unity and wasn't so tightly ideologically connected to bolshevism then. Hitler advocated for racial unity among germans, hence 'national' as in 'KIN'. Bolsheviks advocate for class unity, meaning redistribution (modern definition of socialism).

Nevertheless, apart from Mises and his readers, practically no one thinks of Nazi Germany as a socialist state. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed.

Incorrect, marxists claim it's fascism. Some of the more autistic natsoc advocates will reject the label, but considering how even fascists will use the term as an umbrella for third position ideology, personally, i'll give the commies a gold star for correctly labeling their opposition.

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good...

Correct, it's in the interest of the public that you're able to repair the machinery you purchase, it's in the interest of the public that factories are clean and hygienic. It's in the interest of the public that food isn't exported when reserves are low. It's in the interest of the public that markets aren't cornered and critical goods price gouged. Think people with crazy bills in texas right now.

... and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

No, that is italian fascism. As an example, National socialism practiced ruin-theory. The party knew that it would cease to exist, but the german race would live on. Instead of securing the power of the party, policies were enacted to ensure the german race would live on no matter what. It would be more accurate to say that the individual exists as a means to the end of the RACE. Which from a biological sense is true.

The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation.

Pure lies. Wages of destruction is a good starting point. Labour based currency doesn't fear inflation, since all money created goes to productive means, the money supply increases with the economy, and the economy is largely productive (as opposed to having money being moved back and forth counting as GDP). Not going to bother going into further depth since the lie is so vague.

a million paragraphs about why government shouldn't set prices.

EXCEPT EVERY COUNTRY DOES THIS DURING SHORTAGES FUCK YOU KIKES YOU'RE NOT BUYING ALL THE FUCKING FOODSTUFFS WITH YOUR FAKE MONEY TO CREATE FAMINES TO KILL WHITES. FUCK KIKES.

Every day of his life, the citizen of a socialist state must spend time in endless waiting lines. For him, the problems Americans experienced in the gasoline shortages of the 1970s are normal; only he does not experience them in relation to gasoline — for he does not own a car and has no hope of ever owning one —

FUCK YOU, HITLER MADE THE GERMAN AUTO INDUSTRY PUMP OUT CARS FOR EVERY DAY GERMANS. MORE CARS, MORE HOUSES, MORE CHURCHES, MORE RESTAURANTS, MORE GERMAN CHILDREN. MORE PEOPLE OWNED THEIR OWN BUSINESSES, MORE PEOPLE COULD AFFORD TO START A FAMILY, MORE FARMS, MORE ANIMALS. FUCK. KIKES.

In the United States at the present time, we do not have socialism in any form. And we do not have a dictatorship, let alone a totalitarian dictatorship. We also do not yet have Fascism, though we are moving towards it. Among the essential elements that are still lacking are one-party rule and censorship. We still have freedom of speech and press and free elections, though both have been undermined and their continued existence cannot be guaranteed.

Fuck you kike, Kikes silencing dissidents, hostile takeover of competing businesses, kikes taking money from whites to give to their african imports. Fuck you, and fuck kikes. In Hitlers germany, taxes were lower than in america (again, wages of destruction, read it), the biggest difference was that the tax code was simple, and the taxes were out in the open. You had to pay 13% of your salary in taxes? Boom, done. None of this "SMALL TAX HERE, AND THEN HERE, AND THEN A FEE, AND THE VAT AND THEN FUCK YOU IN THE ASS" FUCK. KIKES.

The growth of the government's economic intervention is synonymous with a loss of individual freedom because it means increasingly initiating the use of physical force to make people do what they do not voluntarily choose to do or prevent them from doing what they do voluntarily choose to do.

You want to make movies? FUCK YOU CONSERVATIVE! Want to sell shit? FUCK YOOOOOU! Want to run a news website? GET FUCKED. Want to fly a flag on private property? FUCK YOU. Want to run for president? FUCK YOU. Want to DO FUCKING ANYTHING? CANCELLED, DOXED, THREATENED, BLACKLISTED, SUICIDED. FUCK YOU.

FUCK YOU KIKE, I'D RATHER BE FREE AND HAVE COMMIES LINED UP AND SHOT THAN LIVE IN THE WEST TODAY. FUCK. YOU.

Fortunately, there is still sufficient freedom in the United States to undo all the damage that has been done. There is first of all the freedom to publicly name it and denounce it.

NAME THE JEW.

>When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism? Because socialism means unity and wasn't so tightly ideologically connected to bolshevism then. Hitler advocated for racial unity among germans, hence 'national' as in 'KIN'. Bolsheviks advocate for class unity, meaning redistribution (modern definition of socialism). >Nevertheless, apart from Mises and his readers, practically no one thinks of Nazi Germany as a socialist state. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. Incorrect, marxists claim it's fascism. Some of the more autistic natsoc advocates will reject the label, but considering how even fascists will use the term as an umbrella for third position ideology, personally, i'll give the commies a gold star for correctly labeling their opposition. >De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good... Correct, it's in the interest of the public that you're able to repair the machinery you purchase, it's in the interest of the public that factories are clean and hygienic. It's in the interest of the public that food isn't exported when reserves are low. It's in the interest of the public that markets aren't cornered and critical goods price gouged. Think people with crazy bills in texas right now. > ... and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State. No, that is italian fascism. As an example, National socialism practiced ruin-theory. The party knew that it would cease to exist, but the german race would live on. Instead of securing the power of the party, policies were enacted to ensure the german race would live on no matter what. It would be more accurate to say that the individual exists as a means to the end of the RACE. Which from a biological sense is true. > The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation. Pure lies. Wages of destruction is a good starting point. Labour based currency doesn't fear inflation, since all money created goes to productive means, the money supply increases with the economy, and the economy is largely productive (as opposed to having money being moved back and forth counting as GDP). Not going to bother going into further depth since the lie is so vague. >a million paragraphs about why government shouldn't set prices. EXCEPT EVERY COUNTRY DOES THIS DURING SHORTAGES FUCK YOU KIKES YOU'RE NOT BUYING ALL THE FUCKING FOODSTUFFS WITH YOUR FAKE MONEY TO CREATE FAMINES TO KILL WHITES. FUCK KIKES. >Every day of his life, the citizen of a socialist state must spend time in endless waiting lines. For him, the problems Americans experienced in the gasoline shortages of the 1970s are normal; only he does not experience them in relation to gasoline — for he does not own a car and has no hope of ever owning one — FUCK YOU, HITLER MADE THE GERMAN AUTO INDUSTRY PUMP OUT CARS FOR EVERY DAY GERMANS. MORE CARS, MORE HOUSES, MORE CHURCHES, MORE RESTAURANTS, MORE GERMAN CHILDREN. MORE PEOPLE OWNED THEIR OWN BUSINESSES, MORE PEOPLE COULD AFFORD TO START A FAMILY, MORE FARMS, MORE ANIMALS. FUCK. KIKES. >In the United States at the present time, we do not have socialism in any form. And we do not have a dictatorship, let alone a totalitarian dictatorship. We also do not yet have Fascism, though we are moving towards it. Among the essential elements that are still lacking are one-party rule and censorship. We still have freedom of speech and press and free elections, though both have been undermined and their continued existence cannot be guaranteed. Fuck you kike, Kikes silencing dissidents, hostile takeover of competing businesses, kikes taking money from whites to give to their african imports. Fuck you, and fuck kikes. In Hitlers germany, taxes were lower than in america (again, wages of destruction, read it), the biggest difference was that the tax code was simple, and the taxes were out in the open. You had to pay 13% of your salary in taxes? Boom, done. None of this "SMALL TAX HERE, AND THEN HERE, AND THEN A FEE, AND THE VAT AND THEN FUCK YOU IN THE ASS" FUCK. KIKES. > The growth of the government's economic intervention is synonymous with a loss of individual freedom because it means increasingly initiating the use of physical force to make people do what they do not voluntarily choose to do or prevent them from doing what they do voluntarily choose to do. You want to make movies? FUCK YOU CONSERVATIVE! Want to sell shit? FUCK YOOOOOU! Want to run a news website? GET FUCKED. Want to fly a flag on private property? FUCK YOU. Want to run for president? FUCK YOU. Want to DO FUCKING ANYTHING? CANCELLED, DOXED, THREATENED, BLACKLISTED, SUICIDED. FUCK YOU. FUCK YOU KIKE, I'D RATHER BE FREE AND HAVE COMMIES LINED UP AND SHOT THAN LIVE IN THE WEST TODAY. FUCK. YOU. >Fortunately, there is still sufficient freedom in the United States to undo all the damage that has been done. There is first of all the freedom to publicly name it and denounce it. NAME THE JEW.

link

(post is archived)