WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

379
https://archive.is/gTOlm

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

I'd take it if the government was a bunch of hardcore white dudes with my best interests at heart and led by a man who'd give his life for me.

[–] 3 pts

But do politicians ever really have your best interests at heart?

[–] 5 pts

Not if you're white and they're jews or jew lovers

[–] 3 pts

No, but just maybe the ones we're discussing would have.

[–] 9 pts

I would take Hitler's Germany any day over what America has become.

[–] 5 pts

Didn't some kike coin the term Nazi?

[–] 1 pt

I only read 'bout two paragraphs of the posted article and it's filled with obvious horse poop. You are correct, the term "Nazi" (along with “Nazism”) is a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden during the 1920’s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism. Heiden was a journalist and member of the Social Democratic Party.

https://20thcenturytruth.wordpress.com/nazis-never-existed/

[–] 0 pt

Ashkenazi jews, coincidence..

Most jews in the west are sephardi, for obvious reasons. Stupidity.

[–] 4 pts

socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production

Except that's not what socialism is. That's communism. Socialism is the idea that the government should regulate business when needed. Essentially that the economy should severe the people, not some strict ideology about total freedom or banning of private property.

NS Germany was socialist, and National Socialism created what was known as an economic miracle, while the rest of the world suffered from the great depression, Germany thrived.

[–] 3 pts

This. I really do not get what it is about American boomers going to great lengths to deny the reality that NS Germany is what the West should seek to emulate. I guess the archetypal boomer is an eternal child.

b-but it says socialism in the name and socialism is baaaad!

[–] 3 pts

The poison of propaganda runs deep.

[–] 2 pts

Television really did a number to those poor boomers, as they did not have much alternatives. We should be grateful to have lived through the internet era, and cherish Truth by archiving it and spreading it.

[–] 0 pt

Socialism begins with distributing stuff to poor people, so nobody falls too much behind. But it never ends there, because more and more people get dependent and get bought. Socialism can end in Communism, the state is the owner of the business. But it can also end in big business becoming the owner of the state, called Fascism. The results are the same.

The economic miracle was not only the result of a mix of lifted spirit and forced labour. It was also the result of massive amounts of oil and metal pouring in (Germany itself had very limited resources). This was the result of the contracts Hitler made with his Wall St and City of London sponsors. He fulfilled his part of the contract when he opened a second front to destroy Russia, while everybody told him that this will destroy Germany.

[–] 1 pt

Socialism begins with distributing stuff to poor people, so nobody falls too much behind.

Again, you're thinking of modern "socialists." While NS Germany had pensions for old people and the like it was nothing resembling a welfare state. Everyone who was able was expected to work, if they were unwilling they'd be left to starve. You could describe some of what they did as redistribution, but it was aimed at preventing people from living off rents and interest (oy vey!) Not taxing working people to give it to niggers who sit around drunk all day.

By not having elections there was no reason to buy votes. You could argue that this wouldn't work in the long term, but it worked just fine in the short term.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one

LOFUCKINGL

[–] 3 pts

Communism was created by the (((bankers))) to enslaved the people further than unregulated capitalism was letting them.

National socialism is one of the only forms of government the kike bankers don’t control.

[–] 2 pts

It's literally in the name. If that doesn't give it away, I don't know what does.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

National Socialism is the polar opposite of marxism.

Is nazi the same as ashkenazi? After all, it's in the name, bruh.

When having the mind of an 8 year old goes wrong.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Having the same letters in a word and having the same entire word in a term are completely different distinctions. Cut the shit. Trying to argue that nazism isn't socialist is blatant intellectual dishonesty. Though a believer in it being as such doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

Trying to argue that America isn't more socialist than the nazis socialist is intellectual dishonesty.

Rich talk for people who fought with the fucking Soviets against the National Socialists. *spits

[–] 1 pt (edited )

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

Because socialism means unity and wasn't so tightly ideologically connected to bolshevism then. Hitler advocated for racial unity among germans, hence 'national' as in 'KIN'. Bolsheviks advocate for class unity, meaning redistribution (modern definition of socialism).

Nevertheless, apart from Mises and his readers, practically no one thinks of Nazi Germany as a socialist state. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed.

Incorrect, marxists claim it's fascism. Some of the more autistic natsoc advocates will reject the label, but considering how even fascists will use the term as an umbrella for third position ideology, personally, i'll give the commies a gold star for correctly labeling their opposition.

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good...

Correct, it's in the interest of the public that you're able to repair the machinery you purchase, it's in the interest of the public that factories are clean and hygienic. It's in the interest of the public that food isn't exported when reserves are low. It's in the interest of the public that markets aren't cornered and critical goods price gouged. Think people with crazy bills in texas right now.

... and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

No, that is italian fascism. As an example, National socialism practiced ruin-theory. The party knew that it would cease to exist, but the german race would live on. Instead of securing the power of the party, policies were enacted to ensure the german race would live on no matter what. It would be more accurate to say that the individual exists as a means to the end of the RACE. Which from a biological sense is true.

The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation.

Pure lies. Wages of destruction is a good starting point. Labour based currency doesn't fear inflation, since all money created goes to productive means, the money supply increases with the economy, and the economy is largely productive (as opposed to having money being moved back and forth counting as GDP). Not going to bother going into further depth since the lie is so vague.

a million paragraphs about why government shouldn't set prices.

EXCEPT EVERY COUNTRY DOES THIS DURING SHORTAGES FUCK YOU KIKES YOU'RE NOT BUYING ALL THE FUCKING FOODSTUFFS WITH YOUR FAKE MONEY TO CREATE FAMINES TO KILL WHITES. FUCK KIKES.

Every day of his life, the citizen of a socialist state must spend time in endless waiting lines. For him, the problems Americans experienced in the gasoline shortages of the 1970s are normal; only he does not experience them in relation to gasoline — for he does not own a car and has no hope of ever owning one —

FUCK YOU, HITLER MADE THE GERMAN AUTO INDUSTRY PUMP OUT CARS FOR EVERY DAY GERMANS. MORE CARS, MORE HOUSES, MORE CHURCHES, MORE RESTAURANTS, MORE GERMAN CHILDREN. MORE PEOPLE OWNED THEIR OWN BUSINESSES, MORE PEOPLE COULD AFFORD TO START A FAMILY, MORE FARMS, MORE ANIMALS. FUCK. KIKES.

In the United States at the present time, we do not have socialism in any form. And we do not have a dictatorship, let alone a totalitarian dictatorship. We also do not yet have Fascism, though we are moving towards it. Among the essential elements that are still lacking are one-party rule and censorship. We still have freedom of speech and press and free elections, though both have been undermined and their continued existence cannot be guaranteed.

Fuck you kike, Kikes silencing dissidents, hostile takeover of competing businesses, kikes taking money from whites to give to their african imports. Fuck you, and fuck kikes. In Hitlers germany, taxes were lower than in america (again, wages of destruction, read it), the biggest difference was that the tax code was simple, and the taxes were out in the open. You had to pay 13% of your salary in taxes? Boom, done. None of this "SMALL TAX HERE, AND THEN HERE, AND THEN A FEE, AND THE VAT AND THEN FUCK YOU IN THE ASS" FUCK. KIKES.

The growth of the government's economic intervention is synonymous with a loss of individual freedom because it means increasingly initiating the use of physical force to make people do what they do not voluntarily choose to do or prevent them from doing what they do voluntarily choose to do.

You want to make movies? FUCK YOU CONSERVATIVE! Want to sell shit? FUCK YOOOOOU! Want to run a news website? GET FUCKED. Want to fly a flag on private property? FUCK YOU. Want to run for president? FUCK YOU. Want to DO FUCKING ANYTHING? CANCELLED, DOXED, THREATENED, BLACKLISTED, SUICIDED. FUCK YOU.

FUCK YOU KIKE, I'D RATHER BE FREE AND HAVE COMMIES LINED UP AND SHOT THAN LIVE IN THE WEST TODAY. FUCK. YOU.

Fortunately, there is still sufficient freedom in the United States to undo all the damage that has been done. There is first of all the freedom to publicly name it and denounce it.

NAME THE JEW.

[–] 1 pt

George Reisman... every single time

[–] 1 pt

Yeah it had a right idea, it seems like its trying to break down what economic theory Germany utilized, it should be understood that they considered economics secondary and they never really recognized any particular system. Socialism to a fascist state, or just any fascist really, is not in regards to economic theory but rather a sense of collective duty. Its a inmaterial value that focuses on the good of the society, straying away from collectivism economically and individualism in a capitalist state. It rather sees everyone working together to reach a goal, as a cog working synchronized. A shoemaker is just as important than a gun manufacturer. No one is above or below each other, everyone has a purpose in society no matter how big or small someones job seems to be. Obviously, reasons like this is why National Socialism and Christianity got along so well, its taking everything inmaterial rather than worshipping materialism.

[–] 0 pt

Good article. The leftie media always tries to associate nazis with right wing when that was never the case. Just more CNN gaslighting..

[–] -1 pt

And you've been gas lighted very well indeed!

Load more (6 replies)