![Future Workforce Not Needed [400x300 - 230KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/npFidf.png){kind=link}
I absolutely agree. Asking it at a town hall would be very useful for understanding his real position, assuming he doesn't give the usual politician answer circumventing the topic entirely.
Labor issues like this just haven't been a big enough of a political issue as they should be. That's probably why we haven't seen much reporting (or what you want to call what the msm does!) on it.
I believe that it is by design. Allowing plumbers to test out of the apprenticeship requirement with written and field testing would be devastating to the goals of the (((trades lobby))). Similarly, allowing physicians to test out of the medical residency requirement with insanely difficult written and field testing would be devastating to the goals of the (((medical lobby))).
Hard to disagree with that.
I do see an argument for government licensure of doctors, but only at the state level. The feds are way too involved in things they have no business doing.
If plumbers make an error it isn't life or death. It could be in the medical field. That said I am very comfortable with hospitals having their own residency programs that are peer reviewed.
(post is archived)