But for the liberal NPC, if the publication says the trials were completed, then that's that. In that person's mind, the authority said it, and so it is truth.
God damnit if that's not the truth. They read the "conclusions/results" section of a study and spout it as fact without even considering the methods or statistical analysis. I've seen dipshits parrot statistically-insignificant findings (p >0.05) as if they were proven-fact, never mind the bullshit methods.
For example, CDC is now saying 2 masks prevent transmission of covid by up to 96% in trials. What were the trials? They sprayed particles of KCl (potassium chloride) ranging in size from 0.1-7 μm at fucking dummies with masks on. So not only did they not spray particles similar in size of the virus (~20 nm, 1/5 the size of the smallest particle used in testing), but HOW DO YOU TEST TRANSMISSION TO A FUCKING DUMMY EVEN IF YOU'RE SPRAYING VIRAL PARTICLES LET ALONE SALT SPRAY!?!?
But yea... I still see assholes wearing two masks, showing me the meme of pissing on others without pants on vs. pissing with pants on as if liquids and aerosols are even close to comparable. My go-to reply is "oh yea I bet you think no one can smell your farts because you're wearing pants and underwear huh?"
Which is actually a great analogy for double masking. Fart particles are way bigger than covid aerosols.
(post is archived)